FR 2024-31221

Overview

Title

Notice of Open to the Public Meetings of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) Program

Agencies

ELI5 AI

People from the government and others interested in new technology will have meetings that anyone can join to learn and share ideas in 2025. These meetings are online, and people can find out when they happen and what they will talk about by visiting a website.

Summary AI

The NITRD Joint Engineering Team (JET) and Middleware And Grid Interagency Coordination (MAGIC) Communities of Practice hold public meetings throughout 2025, providing opportunities for interaction between federal agencies and the public. These meetings, facilitated by the National Science Foundation, focus on sharing information about research and technology development. Interested individuals can participate in these meetings, which will be available via Zoom, and can sign up for notifications or submit comments through designated email addresses. Meeting details, including dates and agendas, are posted on the NITRD Public Meetings webpage.

Abstract

The NITRD Joint Engineering Team (JET) and Middleware And Grid Interagency Coordination (MAGIC) Communities of Practice (COPs) hold meetings that are open to the public to attend. The JET and MAGIC COPs provide an opportunity for the public to engage and participate in information sharing with federal agencies. The JET and MAGIC COPs report to the NITRD Large Scale Networking Interagency Working Group.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 106608
Document #: 2024-31221
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 106608-106609

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces public meetings to be held throughout 2025 by the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) Program, specifically the Joint Engineering Team (JET) and Middleware And Grid Interagency Coordination (MAGIC) Communities of Practice (COPs). These meetings, sponsored by the National Science Foundation, serve as platforms for interaction between federal agencies and the public, focusing on high-performance research, engineering, and technological advancements in networking, middleware, and cloud infrastructure.

General Summary

The notice outlines the opportunities for public participation in these NITRD COP meetings, which are primarily virtual, providing ease of access via Zoom. The meetings aim to facilitate the exchange of information and ideas related to networking and information technology development. Participants are encouraged to engage by signing up for mailing lists and submitting comments via specified email addresses. The document provides guidance on where to find meeting schedules, agendas, and contact information for further inquiries.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable issue is the lack of detailed information concerning the budget or funding associated with organizing these meetings. This omission restricts the ability to evaluate financial efficiency or potential for wasteful spending. Additionally, there seems to be an absence of explicit channels or processes for the public to propose discussion topics, potentially limiting effective public engagement and contribution.

The document also lacks clarity on how public feedback will be utilized or addressed in meeting frameworks, which might result in participants feeling their input is undervalued or ignored. Furthermore, the acronym-heavy nature of the document could alienate readers unfamiliar with terms like JET and MAGIC, hindering understanding. While acronyms are standard in professional contexts, their unexplained usage in public documents could be a barrier for broader audiences.

Broad Impact on the Public

The public could benefit significantly from these meetings as they present a platform to engage directly with federal initiatives in technological development, offering insights and potentially influencing decision-making. However, the lack of detailed procedural information on inviting public feedback or addressing issues raised could dampen enthusiasm and meaningful participation. If participants do not see tangible effects from their contributions, engagement could decline over time.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders in technology and academia involved in high-performance computing and networking, these meetings offer essential networking opportunities and avenues for collaboration with federal agencies. However, these stakeholders may also be affected by the lack of transparency regarding financial allocations or the specific impact of public feedback, which could complicate strategic planning and resource allocation decisions.

In conclusion, the document outlines an important initiative that encourages public involvement in federal research and technological advancement discussions. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of this engagement depends on clearer communication regarding financial transparency and direct public feedback mechanisms. Enhancing these aspects could lead to more substantial public participation and a more informed stakeholder base, ultimately advancing technological innovation and development.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information regarding the budget or funding for the JET and MAGIC COP meetings, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • There is no information on how the public can provide feedback or suggest topics for discussion in the meetings, which might limit public engagement.

  • • The document does not specify how the input collected from the public will be utilized or addressed, which could lead to ambiguity in terms of its impact.

  • • The use of acronyms JET and MAGIC without explanation in the 'Supplementary Information' section might be unclear for readers unfamiliar with these terms.

  • • The language used in the document is generally formal and includes specialized terms (e.g., 'Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)'), which might be difficult for a general audience to understand.

  • • The document heavily references external websites for detailed information, which might be an issue if these sites are not regularly updated or accessible.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 668
Sentences: 24
Entities: 58

Language

Nouns: 257
Verbs: 40
Adjectives: 25
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.40
Average Sentence Length:
27.83
Token Entropy:
5.04
Readability (ARI):
21.30

Reading Time

about 2 minutes