FR 2024-31143

Overview

Title

Providing for the Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies of the Federal Government on December 24, 2024

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The President wrote a special rule saying that on December 24, 2024, most people working for the government can stay home and enjoy a holiday, but some important places might still need to stay open.

Summary AI

The Executive Order 14129 mandates that all federal executive departments and agencies will be closed on December 24, 2024, allowing their employees the day off before Christmas. However, the heads of these departments can require certain offices to remain open for reasons such as national security or other public needs. The closures are also aligned with existing laws regarding employee pay and leave. The order ensures that it doesn't affect any existing legal authority or create new legal rights.

Citation: 89 FR 104857
Document #: 2024-31143
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 104857-104858

AnalysisAI

Executive Order 14129: A Day Off for Federal Employees

The Executive Order 14129, as issued by the President, provides a directive for the closure of federal executive departments and agencies on December 24, 2024. This measure is intended to grant federal employees a day off prior to the Christmas holiday. The Order allows department heads the discretion to keep certain offices operational on this day if required by national security, defense, or other public needs. Additionally, the day is to be treated within the framework of existing laws concerning employee pay and leave.

Significant Concerns and Issues

There are several noteworthy concerns associated with this Executive Order. Firstly, the potential budgetary implications of this mandated day off are not discussed. Paid leave for federal employees might result in significant costs, which are not addressed in the Order. Without explicit budgetary consideration, there could be financial uncertainties. Moreover, while department heads have the authority to determine essential personnel, the criteria for such decisions are not specified, potentially leading to inconsistent application and perceptions of favoritism among employees.

Another complexity lies in the references to Executive Order 11582 and related statutes. These legal citations are not explained within the document, which could be perplexing for readers unfamiliar with them. Additionally, Section 5(b) mentions that the implementation of the Order is subject to available appropriations, yet it remains unclear what steps will be taken if appropriations fall short, adding a layer of uncertainty regarding its execution.

Lastly, while Section 5(c) affirms that the Order does not create enforceable rights, a standard clause in such documents, it may still create an impression of limited accountability or recourse in instances of non-compliance.

Impacts on the Public and Stakeholders

Broadly, the public might view this Executive Order as a positive gesture, acknowledging the demanding schedules of federal employees and allowing them a period of rest and family time during the holiday season. From a societal perspective, this aligns with broader cultural practices of slowing down during the holidays, potentially enhancing employee morale and productivity upon returning to work.

For specific stakeholders, such as federal employees, the day off represents a welcome respite, providing an opportunity to prepare for the holiday, engage in personal or familial activities, or simply rest. However, employees from necessary operational sectors—whose work cannot pause—might feel disadvantaged or less appreciated, despite the essential nature of their roles.

In contrast, individuals reliant on federal services that might be unavailable on this day could experience inconvenience. Organizations and businesses interacting with federal departments may need to adjust timelines to account for the closure.

Overall, while the Executive Order aims to provide a considerate benefit to federal workers, its implementation poses fiscal and operational questions that would benefit from clearer guidelines and anticipatory planning.

Issues

  • • The document declares a closure of federal agencies which may have cost implications due to paid leave for federal employees, but the potential budgetary impact is not discussed.

  • • There is no specific guidance or criteria provided for how agency heads should determine which offices need to remain open, which could lead to inconsistent application and potential favoritism.

  • • The reference to the authority under Executive Order 11582 and 5 U.S.C. 5546 and 6103(b) regarding pay and leave is not explained, which may confuse readers unfamiliar with these specific statutes.

  • • Section 5(b) mentions implementation is subject to the availability of appropriations, but it does not clarify the process or impact if appropriations are insufficient, which could lead to uncertainty in execution.

  • • The language in Section 5(c) indicating that the order does not create any enforceable rights is standard but could be perceived as limiting accountability of the executive order's directives.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 408
Sentences: 15
Entities: 25

Language

Nouns: 120
Verbs: 22
Adjectives: 23
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 24

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.56
Average Sentence Length:
27.20
Token Entropy:
4.70
Readability (ARI):
17.28

Reading Time

about a minute or two