FR 2024-31079

Overview

Title

Interstate Commerce Commission Regulations; Removal of Chapter

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Register Office is cleaning up the rulebook by removing some old rules about how workers behaved at a company called the Interstate Commerce Commission, which doesn't exist anymore since 1996. They're doing this to keep our rulebook neat and tidy.

Summary AI

The Federal Register Office has decided to remove Chapter XL of Title 5 from the Code of Federal Regulations. This chapter contained the ethical conduct standards for employees of the Interstate Commerce Commission, which was abolished in 1995. The removal takes effect on December 26, 2024, as part of maintaining an orderly system of codification. The Interstate Commerce Commission has been non-existent since January 1, 1996.

Type: Rule
Citation: 89 FR 104859
Document #: 2024-31079
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 104859-104859

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The document from the Federal Register announces the removal of Chapter XL of Title 5 from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This Chapter contained the ethical conduct standards for employees of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), which was abolished on December 29, 1995, with its functions terminating officially as of January 1, 1996. The removal is set to be effective on December 26, 2024. This action is part of an ongoing effort to maintain an orderly and updated system of regulations under the authority of the Director of the Office of the Federal Register.

Significant Issues or Concerns

While the removal of a chapter related to a long-defunct agency might seem straightforward, this action raises a few issues. Firstly, the document does not provide an abstract, which could help readers quickly understand the context or purpose of the regulation removal. Additionally, it does not explain why this removal is occurring nearly three decades after the abolition of the ICC. This delay is not clarified, which might lead to questions about procedural or administrative lag.

Moreover, the language in this document includes technical references to specific sections of the U.S. Code and CFR, which may not be easily understood without legal training or familiarity with governmental processes. Finally, no information has been provided regarding the implications for current or former employees related to this removal or if there are any new regulations or updates that replace the ones removed.

Impact on the Public

Removing outdated regulations may simplify the CFR, thereby helping to streamline federal regulations and reduce unnecessary complexity, which can be beneficial for anyone navigating federal rules. For the general public, this specific removal is unlikely to have a direct impact, given the ICC has been non-operational for many years.

For certain individuals or businesses historically tied to the ICC, this change might hold symbolic significance, underscoring the full transition from ICC-era regulations. However, for most people, particularly new generations or those outside of the regulatory or transport sectors, this change is more of a background administrative update and carries no immediate practical implications.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly affected by the actions of the now-defunct ICC, such as regulatory historians, legal professionals, or institutions involved in interstate commerce regulation, the update might offer a point of reference in understanding the evolution and current state of federal regulatory frameworks.

However, the absence of clear details about any transitional impacts—especially for former ICC employees or related entities—means there are gaps in understanding how, if at all, these updates translate to practical changes or adaptations required by specific stakeholder groups. The text does not specify if there are any new ethical standards that replace those removed, leading to potential ambiguity in understanding any new codified changes affecting federal employees in similar roles.

Issues

  • • The document does not include an abstract, which may hinder a quick understanding of the context or purpose of the regulation removal.

  • • The document notes the removal of Chapter XL of Title 5 but does not provide reasons for why this removal is being implemented now, long after the Interstate Commerce Commission was abolished in 1995.

  • • The language used is technical and might be difficult for someone without a legal or governmental background to understand, particularly references to specific sections of U.S. Code and CFR.

  • • No information is provided on the implications of the removal of Chapter XL of Title 5 for current or former employees, or if there are any replacements or updates to the regulations being removed.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 160
Sentences: 5
Entities: 19

Language

Nouns: 46
Verbs: 8
Adjectives: 7
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 26

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
32.00
Token Entropy:
4.30
Readability (ARI):
17.65

Reading Time

less than a minute