FR 2024-31077

Overview

Title

Hazardous Materials: Advancing Safety of Highway, Rail, and Vessel Transportation; Extension of Comment Period

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government wants to make it safer to move dangerous stuff on roads, trains, and boats, so they’ve asked people for ideas on some new rules. They’ve given everyone more time to think and talk about it until the end of April.

Summary AI

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), part of the Department of Transportation, announced an extension of the public comment period for their proposed rule change on the transportation of hazardous materials. Initially set to close on January 27, 2025, the comment period is now extended by 90 days, ending on April 28, 2025. This extension comes after requests from organizations like the Railway Supply Institute and acknowledges the challenges posed by the holiday season in allowing stakeholders adequate time to respond. This proposed rule aims to enhance the safe transportation of hazardous materials by updating the Hazardous Materials Regulations.

Abstract

On October 28, 2024, PHMSA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled "Hazardous Materials: Advancing Safety of Highway, Rail, and Vessel Transportation (HM-265)," proposing amendments to the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to adopt several modal-specific amendments that would enhance the safe transportation of hazardous materials in commerce by highway, rail, and vessel transportation. In response to a request for an extension of the comment period submitted by the Railway Supply Institute (RSI), PHMSA is extending the comment period for the HM-265 NPRM by an additional 90 days.

Citation: 90 FR 1405
Document #: 2024-31077
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 1405-1406

AnalysisAI

The recent document from the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) extends the public comment period for a proposed rule aimed at enhancing the safety of transporting hazardous materials by highway, rail, and vessel. Initially, the deadline for public feedback was set for January 27, 2025, but it has been extended by 90 days to April 28, 2025. This extension acknowledges requests from organizations such as the Railway Supply Institute (RSI) and considers the challenges posed by the holiday season, which could hinder stakeholders' ability to submit feedback timely.

Summary of the Proposed Rule

The proposed rule addressed in this document intends to update the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) with several specific amendments. These changes are designed to improve safety in the transportation of hazardous materials across different modes of transportation—namely, highway, rail, and vessel. By collaborating with other federal agencies like the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the Federal Railroad Administration, and the United States Coast Guard, PHMSA aims to ensure that safety is enhanced while minimizing compliance burdens on industries.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable issue is the absence of detailed information on the potential financial impact these amendments might have on industry stakeholders. Understanding these implications could be crucial for stakeholders when submitting their comments. Additionally, terms like "modal-specific amendments" are introduced without definition or examples, which may lead to confusion among those unfamiliar with the terminology.

The document references evolving conditions and trends affecting transportation safety but fails to specify what these are. Furthermore, regulatory references such as "49 CFR parts 107 and 171 through 180" are offered without context, which could alienate readers unfamiliar with such specifics.

Lastly, while the document provides instructions for submitting confidential business information, it does not clearly distinguish this process in the 'Addresses' section, which might lead to confusion.

Potential Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document, and those like it, have implications for safety in transportation which can affect a wide range of areas including environmental safety, public health, and economic stability. Safeguarding the transport of hazardous materials is crucial for preventing accidents that might endanger communities or disrupt economic activities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The extension of the comment period signals PHMSA's recognition that stakeholders, particularly those in the rail and broader transportation industries, need adequate time to evaluate the proposed changes thoroughly. Organizations like the RSI and other trade bodies representing interests such as chemical manufacturers or the petroleum industry may benefit from this extension. It provides additional time to assess how proposed changes could impact their operations and to formulate comprehensive feedback to the agency.

However, the lack of detailed financial impact data may pose difficulties for these stakeholders in crafting informed comments. This could potentially slow down the rulemaking process if stakeholders feel they need more data to provide meaningful feedback. In contrast, the extended period allows stakeholders to overcome scheduling challenges due to the winter holiday season and work collaboratively within and across organizations.

Overall, the extension by PHMSA reflects an effort to balance thorough public participation with the need for advancing regulatory safety enhancements efficiently.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the potential financial impact of the proposed amendments on industry stakeholders, which could be informative for public comment.

  • • The term 'modal-specific amendments' is used without a clear definition or examples, which could be clarified for better understanding by all stakeholders.

  • • The document references 'changing conditions and trends' that affect transportation safety but does not specify what these are, leaving room for ambiguity.

  • • The use of technical regulatory references such as '49 CFR parts 107 and 171 through 180' without context or explanation may be difficult for general public understanding.

  • • The contact for submitting Confidential Business Information (CBI) is not differentiated in the 'Addresses' section for clarity, requiring readers to infer this from the later paragraphs.

  • • The reasons for the requested extension of the comment period are mentioned but could benefit from additional context on why these specific organizations (RSI and others) needed more time.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,279
Sentences: 41
Entities: 140

Language

Nouns: 444
Verbs: 95
Adjectives: 52
Adverbs: 20
Numbers: 76

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.27
Average Sentence Length:
31.20
Token Entropy:
5.38
Readability (ARI):
22.48

Reading Time

about 5 minutes