Overview
Title
Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Request for Extension of Time
Agencies
ELI5 AI
Wyoming Interstate Company needs more time to finish a big building project because they don't have enough workers and tools, and people have until January 3, 2024, to say what they think about this request. If everyone agrees, a director will decide, but if not, it will take longer to figure things out.
Summary AI
Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C. (WIC) has requested more time to finish building the Cheyenne to Piceance Expansion Project in Wyoming, originally due by February 2025, but now delayed due to contractor issues and equipment shortages. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is allowing the public to comment on this extension request until January 3, 2024. If there are disputes, the commission will handle them within 45 days, but uncontested requests will be addressed by the Director of the Office of Energy Projects. Public comments are encouraged to be submitted electronically.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C. (WIC) is seeking an extension to complete the Cheyenne to Piceance Expansion Project in Wyoming. Initially set to be operational by February 2025, unexpected delays related to contractor issues and equipment shortages have prompted this request. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has opened a period for public comment on this extension request, ending on January 3, 2024.
Key Issues and Concerns
The document is filled with legal and procedural jargon that might be challenging for the general public to interpret. References to specific codes within the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and intricate legal proceedings are likely unfamiliar to individuals without a legal background. There is no information provided about the financial impact of these delays, making it difficult to assess potential financial waste or burden.
Another concern is the complexity of the process for public intervention and comment. The formal language and detailed instructions, like filing motions to intervene according to specific rules, could discourage participation from those without legal experience or knowledge. This barrier may prevent stakeholders from effectively engaging with the process.
Furthermore, the document lacks clarity on what constitutes a "contest" regarding the extension request. Without this information, stakeholders might find themselves confused about their ability to influence proceedings.
Public Impact
For the general public, this document and the requests therein have limited immediate impact. However, they could potentially affect local communities by delaying the benefits that such infrastructure projects might bring, including improved energy distribution or economic development.
Stakeholder Impacts
Specific stakeholders, such as local landowners, environmental groups, and businesses within Sweetwater County, Wyoming, are likely more directly affected. For landowners and residents, the delays might mean prolonged construction inconveniences or continued uncertainty about the project's timeline. Environmental groups might see this as an opportunity to raise concerns about the project's compliance with environmental standards.
Construction and energy businesses might perceive the delays negatively, seeing them as disrupting market operations or affecting regional energy reliability. Conversely, the opportunity to comment and intervene allows these stakeholders to have their voices heard, potentially influencing future decisions.
Conclusion
While the intention behind the notice is procedural, the impact on various stakeholders depends largely on their ability to engage with the detailed and legalistic processes described. Simplifying these processes or increasing transparency about impacts might enhance public understanding and involvement, supporting more informed community responses.
Issues
• The document contains complex legal and procedural terminology that might be difficult for the general public to understand, such as references to specific CFR codes and legal proceedings.
• There is no cost information or budgetary implications mentioned, making it hard to assess if there is any potential wasteful spending.
• The process for public intervention and comment is outlined in a formal manner that might be challenging for laypersons to navigate without experienced guidance.
• The document does not provide detailed information on what constitutes a 'contest' in the context of this extension request, potentially leading to misunderstandings among stakeholders.
• The instructions for filing comments or requests are complex and require careful adherence to ensure proper submission, which might prevent participation from non-expert stakeholders.
• The potential impact of construction delays on budgets, timelines, or stakeholders is not clearly discussed, leaving room for concerns about transparency.