FR 2024-30933

Overview

Title

Notice of Intent To Seek Approval To Extend an Information Collection

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Science Foundation (NSF) wants to keep checking how well some special science clubs are doing their work and share it. They need people to share what they think about this by February 28, 2025, and they will ask for permission to keep doing this check for up to three more years.

Summary AI

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is planning to extend an information collection related to the Science and Technology Centers (STC): Integrative Partnerships program. The goal of this program is to promote innovation in research, education, and knowledge transfer between various institutions and organizations. NSF is seeking public comments by February 28, 2025, as part of the clearance process required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The collected information will be used to assess the progress of the STCs and ensure ongoing funding.

Abstract

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is announcing plans to request clearance of this collection. In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are providing opportunity for public comment on this action. After obtaining and considering public comment, NSF will prepare the submission requesting that OMB approve clearance of this collection for no longer than three years.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 106609
Document #: 2024-30933
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 106609-106610

AnalysisAI

The National Science Foundation (NSF) has announced its plans to extend a data collection process for its Science and Technology Centers (STC): Integrative Partnerships program, as outlined in the recent notice published in the Federal Register. This program is designed to foster innovation by integrating research, education, and partnerships across various organizations and disciplines. As part of the request, the NSF is seeking public comments until February 28, 2025, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information collected will help the NSF to evaluate the progress of the STCs and decide on future funding.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A notable concern is the expiration date for approval of the current information collection, which is listed as February 28, 2022. This seems outdated, raising questions about whether this is a clerical error or a gap in request processing. Clarity on the current status would be beneficial.

The notice lacks specificity in terms of criteria or benchmarks for evaluating the STCs' performance. This absence may result in ambiguity, making it difficult to ensure objective assessments of the centers' progress.

Furthermore, the document does not address how data privacy and protection are incorporated into the process. Given the potentially sensitive nature of the data involved, stakeholders might be concerned about privacy and data security measures in place.

The text uses technical language and complex phrases, such as "integrative conduct of research" and "evaluation technical assistance contractor." Such language could be challenging for general readers, potentially limiting the accessibility of the document and understanding among laypersons.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document represents an opportunity to contribute to the discussion regarding the continuation and potential improvement of a significant scientific program. Public input may influence how these centers operate and how information is collected and used by the NSF.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For the twelve centers involved, the information collection directly impacts their funding and operations. The process outlined in the notice could affirm or jeopardize future NSF support based on the reported data. Non-profit institutions and federal agencies, listed as respondents, may need to allocate substantial time (estimated at 100 hours per center annually) to meet the reporting requirements. This can influence their resource management and strategic planning.

In summary, while the document outlines a procedural necessity for the NSF's funding endeavors, addressing the identified issues concerning approval dates, evaluation criteria, privacy considerations, and language complexity would enhance its clarity and stakeholder confidence. Public participation in the commentary process can potentially lead to more effective and transparent administration of this program.

Issues

  • • The expiration date of approval is listed as February 28, 2022, which seems outdated and could be a clerical error for the current request to extend the information collection.

  • • The document does not specify the specific criteria or benchmarks for evaluating the performance of STCs, which might lead to ambiguity in assessing the centers' progress.

  • • Details on how the data collected will be protected and the privacy considerations related to this collection are not addressed, which could be a concern given the data sensitivity.

  • • Use of technical language and phrases (e.g., 'integrative conduct of research', 'evaluation technical assistance contractor') might be complex for lay readers to fully understand, reducing the document's accessibility.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,028
Sentences: 36
Entities: 66

Language

Nouns: 353
Verbs: 77
Adjectives: 51
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 43

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.21
Average Sentence Length:
28.56
Token Entropy:
5.30
Readability (ARI):
20.96

Reading Time

about 3 minutes