Overview
Title
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Department of Defense wants to make sure they have the right forms to check and approve who can see important stuff. They asked for help to do this, and people can tell them what they think until January 29, 2025.
Summary AI
The Department of Defense (DoD) has sent a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to clear the Personnel Security System Access Request (PSSAR) Form, DD Form 2962, Volume 2, for information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This form helps gather necessary data to create user accounts for accessing various personnel systems that deal with security clearances and suitability determinations for military and DoD employees. The request is open for public comments until January 29, 2025. The process is voluntary and each respondent needs to submit the form to maintain compliance with account request procedures.
Abstract
The DoD has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document in focus is a notice from the Department of Defense (DoD), specifically from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security. It outlines a proposal submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the extension of an existing information collection request. This request pertains to a form known as the Personnel Security System Access Request (PSSAR) Form, also denoted as DD Form 2962, Volume 2. The form is intended to facilitate access to various personnel systems pertinent to security clearances and employment suitability within the DoD.
General Summary
The notice indicates that the OMB is reviewing a proposal to continue collecting information through the PSSAR form. This process involves gathering necessary data to create user accounts for accessing personnel systems, which are crucial for evaluating and granting security clearances. The notice highlights that public comments on the proposal are welcome until January 29, 2025. It further provides details such as the average burden per response, frequency of response, and the voluntary nature of participation.
Significant Issues and Concerns
One issue with the document is its reliance on specialized jargon, such as terms like "National Background Investigation Services" and "Defense Information System for Security," without offering explanations comprehensible to the general public. Such terminology could alienate those unfamiliar with government or military operations. Additionally, the document uses several abbreviations such as PSSAR, OMB, and DoD without previously defining them, potentially leading to confusion for readers not well-versed in these acronyms.
The "Needs and Uses" section attempts to justify the collection of information; however, the language is somewhat vague about the specific activities permitted through this process. Moreover, the contact information provided is split across two lines, which might complicate its utility for those wishing to reach out for further inquiries.
Impact on the Public
Broadly, the document’s implications for the public revolve around ensuring that the systems within the DoD continue to operate smoothly and securely. The PSSAR form helps validate and grant access to various personnel systems, which indirectly contributes to national security. However, public understanding and participation in commenting on this proposal might be hindered by the issues mentioned earlier.
Impact on Stakeholders
For those directly involved, such as military personnel, civilian employees, and contractors, the continuation of this information collection is vital. It ensures that their access to sensitive systems is maintained, thereby enabling their roles within the DoD. On the other hand, the voluntary nature of the request may influence participation levels, as not all individuals may feel compelled or informed enough to contribute their input during the comment period.
In conclusion, while the document serves an important function in the administrative processes of the DoD, its effectiveness in engaging the public hinges on improved clarity and accessibility of information. Enhanced communication could bolster trust and understanding, fostering a more participative environment for public commentary.
Issues
• The document does not provide specific dollar amounts to evaluate for potential wasteful spending or favoritism.
• The language regarding the 'Needs and Uses' section could be clearer about what specific actions are being permitted through the information collection process.
• The document relies on specialized terms (e.g., 'National Background Investigation Services', 'Defense Information System for Security') without providing explanations, which might be unclear to general public readers.
• The use of abbreviations such as 'PSSAR', 'OMB', and 'DoD' without initial definitions might be difficult for readers unfamiliar with these acronyms.
• The contact information section is divided into two lines, which may cause confusion for those attempting to use it.