FR 2024-30874

Overview

Title

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institute on Aging is having a secret meeting online to talk about some important ideas people have for getting money to study aging. They are keeping it private to keep people's personal details safe.

Summary AI

The National Institute on Aging announced a closed meeting of their Special Emphasis Panel on February 13, 2025, from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. This meeting will review and evaluate grant applications and will not be open to the public to protect confidential information and personal privacy. The meeting will be held virtually and will include discussions about patentable material and personal details related to the grant submissions. For any inquiries, interested parties can contact Dr. Anita T. Tandle at the National Institute of Aging.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 105619
Document #: 2024-30874
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 105619-105620

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register serves as a notice of a closed meeting by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) slated for February 13, 2025. This meeting focuses on reviewing and evaluating grant applications, specifically targeting biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (AD & ADRD). It will convene virtually and be closed to the public to prevent the disclosure of confidential information such as trade secrets or personal data.

General Summary

This notice informs the public about a closed meeting of the NIA's Special Emphasis Panel. The primary agenda is the assessment of grant applications, which involves discussions that may reveal sensitive information such as intellectual property or personal information. Therefore, the meeting will not be open to the public to maintain confidentiality and protect privacy.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One significant issue arises from the closed nature of the meeting. While understandable in terms of protecting sensitive data, this limits transparency and public insight into the decision-making process. There is also no mention of whether any post-meeting summaries or outcomes will be shared with the public to keep them informed while still maintaining confidentiality.

Additionally, the document does not specify any mechanisms for stakeholders or interested parties to provide input or feedback, even though this might be important in the planning or evaluation stages of such meetings. Furthermore, while the notice includes contact information, it omits a clear process for addressing any potential complaints or concerns regarding the meeting's closed status.

The language used to cite specific laws and codes, such as sections of the U.S.C., is somewhat technical. This might pose challenges to general audiences who lack a legal background, potentially obscuring their understanding of the underlying reasons for the meeting's confidentiality.

Public Impact

For the general public, this notice primarily serves as information about the NIA's ongoing work and decisions regarding grant applications in the field of aging research. However, the lack of transparency due to the closed format may leave some members of the public feeling disconnected from governmental processes related to public health.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For researchers and professionals in the fields of Alzheimer's disease and aging, this meeting represents an important step in the allocation of research funds and resources. These stakeholders are directly affected by the outcomes of the grant evaluation process as it could determine the direction and capacity of their future research efforts.

However, the absence of publicly accessible information on meeting outcomes may also negatively affect stakeholders who rely on updates to gauge the NIA's funding priorities and strategic directions. Ensuring a degree of information flow post-meeting could benefit both the scientific community and the public by promoting informed awareness and engagement with NIA’s initiatives.

Issues

  • • The notice states that the meeting will be closed to the public due to the potential disclosure of confidential information. However, it does not specify any public outcomes or summaries that might be shared post-meeting to ensure transparency.

  • • The meeting is set to be conducted virtually, and while this is mentioned, there is no information about how stakeholders or interested parties could provide input or feedback, if applicable.

  • • The document provides contact information but does not clarify the process for addressing complaints or issues related to the meeting or its closed status.

  • • The language used in citing specific laws and codes (U.S.C. sections) might be difficult for the general public to understand without a legal background.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 301
Sentences: 14
Entities: 38

Language

Nouns: 113
Verbs: 14
Adjectives: 8
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.49
Average Sentence Length:
21.50
Token Entropy:
4.69
Readability (ARI):
18.32

Reading Time

about a minute or two