FR 2024-30766

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission wants to know what people think about some paperwork rules they have. These rules take about three hours a year to deal with, and people can say what they think about this before the end of January 2025.

Summary AI

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is seeking public comments on an Information Collection Request (ICR) submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as part of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This request pertains to the rules governing the review of decisions by National Futures Association regarding disciplinary and membership matters. The proposed extension does not change the existing reporting burden, with the estimated total annual burden remaining at three hours. Interested parties must submit their comments by January 27, 2025.

Abstract

In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected costs and burden.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 105011
Document #: 2024-30766
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 105011-105012

AnalysisAI

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has released a notice seeking public input on an Information Collection Request (ICR) that has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This request involves rules relating to the review of decisions made by the National Futures Association concerning disciplinary and membership issues. Those interested in submitting comments have until January 27, 2025, to do so.

Summary of the Document

This notice is part of the compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which aims to minimize the paperwork burden for individuals and businesses. The primary focus of this ICR is on maintaining current procedures under the Commodity Exchange Act regarding how the CFTC reviews decisions of futures associations on various matters, such as disciplinary actions. The current proposal does not alter the reporting burden, which is estimated to remain at a mere three hours a year.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several issues and potential concerns within the document. Importantly, the document notes a reporting burden of only three hours annually. Without additional context, this estimation may seem significantly underestimated. Given that this is intended to cover the administrative processes involved in futures trading regulation, it's plausible that the actual time requirements could be underestimated.

Additionally, the document's language, particularly regarding how to submit comments, is densely written and may be challenging for the general public to fully comprehend, especially those unfamiliar with the regulatory review processes. This could potentially discourage public participation and feedback. Furthermore, there is a degree of repetition in the instructions for submitting comments, which could be streamlined to enhance clarity and readability.

The document does not provide any justification on how this collection of information could impact or benefit the industry or the general public, which makes it challenging to understand the necessity or value of such data collection.

Impact on the Public

From a broader public perspective, this document is unlikely to have a direct impact on most individuals, as it pertains specifically to futures trading regulation—a niche area. However, it is a part of maintaining transparency and accountability within the regulatory bodies that oversee significant economic sectors.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved, such as members of futures associations or entities under the CFTC’s jurisdiction, the proposed continuation of current practices without any change in the reported burden is significant. This simplifies compliance processes since no additional administrative work is introduced.

On the negative side, the perceived low estimate of the burden may indicate a lack of thorough assessment that could affect stakeholders if administrative requirements are more burdensome than suggested. Additionally, the dense language and lack of straightforward explanations might hinder effective engagement with the review process, limiting stakeholder feedback and participation.

Overall, while these procedural details are crucial for the smooth operation and oversight of futures trading, the document could benefit from clearer communication and more detailed justification to effectively engage both the stakeholders and the general public.

Issues

  • • The document mentions a reporting burden of only three hours annually, which could imply an underestimation of actual time requirements, but without further details it is difficult to assess the accuracy of this estimate.

  • • The language regarding submission of comments is dense and might be challenging for individuals unfamiliar with regulatory processes to fully understand.

  • • There is a lot of repetition in the instructions for submitting comments, which could be streamlined for clarity.

  • • The document does not provide information on the impact or benefit of collecting this information, making it difficult to assess the necessity or value of the information collection.

  • • The document uses several abbreviations such as OIRA, OMB, PRA, and CFTC without consistent initial explanations, which might be confusing for readers unfamiliar with these terms.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,131
Sentences: 39
Entities: 101

Language

Nouns: 373
Verbs: 88
Adjectives: 34
Adverbs: 16
Numbers: 62

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.56
Average Sentence Length:
29.00
Token Entropy:
5.39
Readability (ARI):
22.74

Reading Time

about 4 minutes