Overview
Title
Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); Twentieth Regular Meeting: Taxa Being Considered for Amendments to the CITES Appendices and Proposed Resolutions, Decisions, and Agenda Items Being Considered; Observer Information
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is planning a big meeting about protecting animals and plants, where they will talk about which species need extra protection to keep them from disappearing. They're asking people for ideas, but it's a bit tricky because some of the details are hard to understand.
Summary AI
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced preparations for the 20th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), set for November 2025 in Uzbekistan. They plan to propose amendments to the CITES Appendices, which list species needing protection, and are considering resolutions and agenda items based on public feedback. The notice invites public comments on potential proposals and explains how organizations can participate as observers. The Service is also considering various animal and plant species for protection, with a focus on ensuring trade practices do not threaten their survival.
Abstract
The United States, as a Party to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), may propose amendments to the CITES Appendices for consideration at meetings of the Conference of the Parties. The twentieth regular meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES (CoP20) is scheduled to be held in Uzbekistan, November 24-December 5, 2025. With this notice, we respond to recommendations received from the public concerning proposed amendments to the CITES Appendices (species proposals) and proposed resolutions, decisions, and agenda items that the United States might submit for consideration at CoP20; invite your comments and information on these potential proposals and working documents; and provide information on how U.S. nongovernmental organizations can attend CoP20 as observers.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has published a detailed notice regarding preparations for the Twentieth Conference of the Parties (CoP20) to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). This conference is scheduled to take place in Uzbekistan from November 24 to December 5, 2025. As part of its preparations, the Agency is considering several amendments to the CITES Appendices, which catalog species requiring international trade controls to prevent their extinction. Additionally, the document outlines various proposed resolutions and agenda items, some of which come from public recommendations.
General Summary
The notice serves multiple purposes. First, it invites public comments on potential species proposals and working documents that the U.S. might submit at CoP20. Second, it details how U.S. non-governmental organizations can participate as observers in the conference. Lastly, it identifies a vast array of species—from mammals and birds to plants and fishes—being considered for changes in their protection status under CITES.
The document's primary focus is on regulating international trade to ensure such trade does not threaten the survival of these species. It reflects the intricate efforts of the U.S. Government to engage with international conservation policies actively.
Significant Issues or Concerns
There are several issues within the notice that deserve consideration:
Complexity and Accessibility: The document uses technical language and extensive lists, making it less accessible to the general public. This complexity could obscure public understanding of how conference decisions might affect species protection efforts.
Decision-Making Transparency: The criteria for decisions, especially regarding why certain species or proposals are prioritized over others, are not thoroughly detailed. This lack of clarity could lead to perceptions of biased or unsubstantiated decision-making.
Public Participation: While public comments are invited, the document lacks details on how these comments will directly influence the final decisions. This could raise concerns about the extent to which public feedback is valued or integrated into policymaking.
Fiscal Responsibility: Although the document hints at budget considerations for proposals and resolutions, it falls short of providing specific financial implications or prioritization criteria. This omission might lead to questions about responsible fiscal management.
Broad Public Impact
The notice could significantly impact the public by shaping conservation priorities and international trade regulations affecting biodiversity. The outcome of CoP20 could lead to stricter trade controls, potentially enhancing global species conservation efforts. However, the American public might find it challenging to engage meaningfully with the process due to the document's complexity and the ambiguity of the public consultation outcomes.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For environmental NGOs and conservationists, this notice represents a critical opportunity to influence international policy and increase protection for vulnerable species through public comments and participation at CoP20. However, the ambiguity around defining technical qualifications for observer status and how the comments will inform decision-making are areas of concern.
On the other hand, industries reliant on international trade of wildlife and plants might view potential amendments as regulatory hurdles. These stakeholders could be affected by increased restrictions or additional documentation requirements, which might impact their business operations.
Governments, especially those of range countries, may see changes in their obligations under CITES, necessitating adjustments in their wildlife management practices to comply with revised trade regulations.
In conclusion, while the notice sets the stage for significant international dialogue on conservation, the lack of transparency and clear communication pathways might hinder effective public engagement and, consequently, the realization of conservation objectives.
Issues
• The document contains a large number of species being considered for amendments to the CITES Appendices, but there is limited detail on the criteria or rationale for certain decisions, which could lead to perceived favoritism or bias without clear justification.
• The language used throughout the document is highly technical and complex, potentially making it difficult for the general public to understand the proceedings and implications of CoP20 decisions.
• Several sections have extensive lists of species, resolutions, and decisions, making it challenging for readers to quickly identify key issues or priorities without detailed explanations.
• The document discusses potential observer status for NGOs but does not provide clear criteria for what constitutes 'technical qualifications' for approval, which could lead to ambiguity or unequal treatment of organizations.
• The justification for not pursuing certain proposals or resolutions based on lack of information or resources is quite vague, lacking specific criteria or benchmarks for decision-making.
• Public comments are invited but details on how these comments might influence decision-making are limited, which might raise concerns about the transparency and impact of public participation.
• The document includes mentions of funding and budget evaluations but does not clearly outline financial implications or the criteria used for prioritizing resources, which could lead to questions about fiscal responsibility or oversight.