FR 2024-30673

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Request; 60-Day Public Comment Request

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Health Department wants to know what people think about studying programs that help prevent teen pregnancies. They're asking for opinions on how they plan to collect information from certain groups to see how these programs are working.

Summary AI

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is requesting public comments on a new information collection effort to study teen pregnancy prevention programs. The Office of Population Affairs will conduct a survey to gather information from 53 Tier 1 grantees and 12 Tier 2 grantees to evaluate how these programs are implemented and their effectiveness in reducing unintended teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. The data collected will be used to create detailed profiles of each program. Comments must be submitted by February 24, 2025, either via email or phone.

Abstract

In compliance with the requirement of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Secretary (OS), Department of Health and Human Services, is publishing the following summary of a proposed collection for public comment.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 105061
Document #: 2024-30673
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 105061-105061

AnalysisAI

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has recently published a notice inviting public comments on a proposed information collection initiative under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The initiative, spearheaded by the Office of Population Affairs (OPA), aims to gather data from organizations involved in teen pregnancy prevention programs. The main focus will be on 53 Tier 1 grantees and 12 Tier 2 grantees, who were funded during the fiscal year 2023. This effort intends to evaluate how these programs are being implemented and their success in reducing unintended teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. The results will help in developing comprehensive profiles for each program to enhance understanding and effectiveness.

General Summary

The notice is primarily a call for public comment on an upcoming survey that will involve specific organizations tasked with executing or evaluating teen pregnancy prevention programs. The collected data will address how these organizations implement their strategies and the effectiveness of their programs. The public is encouraged to submit their comments by February 24, 2025, providing feedback on the necessity, accuracy, and approach of this data collection effort.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues emerge from the documentation surrounding this initiative. First, there is a lack of clarity regarding the estimated cost of this project, which leaves open questions about its financial efficiency. Without detailed cost projections, it's challenging for the public to gauge whether taxpayer money is being utilized appropriately.

Furthermore, the selection process for the grantees remains unspecified. The document mentions 53 Tier 1 and 12 Tier 2 grantees but does not detail the criteria used for their selection. This lack of transparency could lead to questions about possible favoritism or bias in the selection process.

Privacy concerns also arise, as there is no clear indication of how the gathered data will be handled or protected. Given the sensitive nature of the subject, assuring the public that privacy safeguards are in place is crucial.

Additionally, there is ambiguity surrounding the term "diverse strategies." While the document suggests that grantees will employ a variety of methods, it fails to define what these strategies might be, potentially leading to confusion about what the initiative is truly examining.

The use of technical terms such as "Tier 1 and Tier 2 Rigorous Evaluation grantees" could also be an obstacle for the general public's understanding, as the document does not provide explanations or context for these classifications.

Broader Public Impact

This initiative has the potential to shape public health strategies by offering insights into effective methods for preventing teen pregnancy and reducing related social issues. By developing detailed profiles of each participating organization’s methods and outcomes, HHS can better disseminate successful strategies to a wider audience.

Impact on Stakeholders

For the public, particularly those in communities affected by high rates of teen pregnancy, this initiative could deliver tangible benefits by fostering more effective prevention programs. By serving as a basis for improving existing frameworks or developing new ones, the findings might contribute to long-term reductions in teen pregnancy rates and improvements in adolescent health.

For the grantees, especially those selected for the study, participation could bring positive visibility and validation of their efforts. However, concerns about data privacy and the transparency of program evaluations may pose challenges, requiring careful management to preserve trust and foster constructive outcomes.

In summary, while the initiative has the potential to effect positive change, addressing the aforementioned issues is essential to bolster public confidence and ensure the project’s success.

Issues

  • • The document does not explicitly state the estimated cost of the proposed information collection project, making it difficult to determine if the spending is wasteful.

  • • The document lacks specificity regarding the selection criteria for the 53 Tier 1 grantees and 12 Tier 2 grantees, which could raise concerns about potential favoritism.

  • • There is no information on how the collected data will be utilized or protected, which could raise privacy concerns.

  • • The document refers to 'diverse strategies' but does not clarify what these strategies entail, leading to ambiguity.

  • • The document uses technical terms such as 'Tier 1 and Tier 2 Rigorous Evaluation grantees' without providing definitions or context, which could be confusing to the general public.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 582
Sentences: 21
Entities: 44

Language

Nouns: 208
Verbs: 46
Adjectives: 20
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 39

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.20
Average Sentence Length:
27.71
Token Entropy:
5.02
Readability (ARI):
20.33

Reading Time

about 2 minutes