FR 2024-30624

Overview

Title

New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The New England Fishery Management Council is having a computer meeting on January 14, 2025, to talk about plans for fishing in a special area near New England. People can watch this meeting online, and there are plans to help anyone who needs special assistance to join.

Summary AI

The New England Fishery Management Council is holding a public meeting via webinar on January 14, 2025, to discuss actions impacting New England fisheries within the exclusive economic zone. During the meeting, the Scallop Advisory Panel will review priorities and work on a strategic plan for 2025. The recommendations from this panel may later be discussed and acted upon by the full Council. The meeting will be accessible online to the public, including special accommodations for individuals with disabilities.

Abstract

The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is scheduling a public meeting of its Scallop Advisory Panel via webinar to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 104989
Document #: 2024-30624
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 104989-104989

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces a public meeting organized by the New England Fishery Management Council, specifically the Scallop Advisory Panel. This meeting, scheduled for January 14, 2025, aims to discuss and review priorities for 2025 in relation to New England fisheries. The meeting is accessible via a webinar format, making it possible for a wider audience to participate, and is accommodating to people with disabilities. The public can register online to attend the session. Recommendations from this meeting may later be presented to the full Council for further consideration and action.

Significant Issues or Concerns

There are several concerns and gaps in information that could impact the extent to which the public and stakeholders understand and engage with the process:

  • Lack of Detailed Information: The announcement lacks specific details about the budget implications or any potential costs associated with organizing the public meeting. This information is crucial for stakeholders and the public to evaluate transparency and accountability.

  • Purpose of the Meeting: While the document indicates a general agenda involving the review of scallop work priorities and a strategic plan development, it lacks specific information on what actions or strategies will be discussed. This could lead to confusion or disengagement from the public and stakeholders who seek to understand the impacts of these discussions.

  • Legal Citations: The document includes references to legal authorities, such as citations from the U.S. Code, without explanation. Such citations may be unclear to individuals without a legal background, and a brief explanation could enhance accessibility and comprehension for all readers.

  • Public Participation: Information on how the public can interact, provide input, or ask questions during the webinar is minimal. Adding details about opportunities for public commentary or engagement could encourage more meaningful participation.

  • Understanding the Council Structure: The announcement assumes a level of familiarity with the New England Fishery Management Council and its advisory panels, which may not be common knowledge. Providing a brief overview of the Council’s role, structure, and the purpose of its advisory panels would be beneficial for a general audience.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

The document has the potential to impact the public and specific stakeholders both positively and negatively:

  • Broad Public Impact: The transparency of the webinar format allows greater public access to the proceedings, which aligns with democratic principles of openness and accountability. However, the lack of detailed information on participation might limit meaningful public engagement.

  • Impact on Stakeholders: For stakeholders within the fishing industry and environmental advocacy groups, the outcomes of this meeting could directly influence regulatory measures, conservation efforts, and economic interests within the exclusive economic zone of New England fisheries. The document's vagueness in detailing strategic priorities could lead to uncertain anticipation of potential policy changes.

By addressing these issues, the Council can enhance the document’s clarity and ensure a broader and more nuanced understanding and involvement from interested parties and the public at large. This would not only foster trust and transparency but also ensure that the meeting's outcomes are well-informed by a diverse range of perspectives.

Issues

  • • The document lacks specific information on budget allocation or potential costs associated with the public meeting, making it difficult to audit for wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The purpose of the Scallop Advisory Panel's meeting could be made clearer by providing more detailed information on the specific actions or strategies being considered or developed.

  • • The use of legal citations (e.g., 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) without explanation might be unclear to a lay audience unfamiliar with legal references. A brief explanation of this legal authority could improve understanding.

  • • Information on how the public can participate in or provide input to the meeting, aside from the registration link, is sparse and could benefit from additional details.

  • • The document assumes familiarity with the structure and function of the New England Fishery Management Council and its Advisory Panels, which may not be clear to all readers. A brief overview could enhance comprehension.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 457
Sentences: 18
Entities: 41

Language

Nouns: 167
Verbs: 23
Adjectives: 24
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 26

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.79
Average Sentence Length:
25.39
Token Entropy:
4.95
Readability (ARI):
17.06

Reading Time

about a minute or two