FR 2024-30597

Overview

Title

Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Record of Decision (ROD) on the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Floodplain Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Kenneth G. Ward (Lynden) and Sumas Land Ports of Entry (LPOE) Modernization and Expansion Projects in Lynden and Sumas, Washington

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is making the places where people cross the border in Lynden and Sumas, Washington, better and bigger. They want to help keep things safe and make it faster for people to get across, but some details like how much it will cost and how they will take care of animals and plants near the border are not clear yet.

Summary AI

The General Services Administration (GSA) has issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for modernizing and expanding the Lynden and Sumas land ports of entry in Washington. The projects aim to support U.S. Customs and Border Protection by increasing the ports' functionality, capacity, and safety. For the Lynden site, the GSA prefers the North-South Oriented Expansion, while for the Sumas site, the Multi-Story Construction Expansion is favored. Both alternatives require acquiring additional land and involve site preparation and construction.

Abstract

GSA issued a ROD for the Modernization and Expansion of the Lynden and Sumas LPOEs in Lynden and Sumas, Washington on December 27, 2024 (Identification Number: EISX-023-00-010-1728643103). The ROD was prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and the GSA PBS NEPA Desk Guide.

Type: Notice
Citation: 90 FR 107
Document #: 2024-30597
Date:
Volume: 90
Pages: 107-108

AnalysisAI

The document titled "Notice of Availability for the Record of Decision" describes the United States General Services Administration's (GSA) plans to modernize and expand the Lynden and Sumas land ports of entry (LPOEs) in Washington. This modernization effort aims to support the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Customs and Border Protection mission by enhancing functionality, capacity, security, and safety at these facilities connecting the U.S. to Canada.

Summary of the Document

The document states that the GSA has finalized a Record of Decision (ROD) for these projects. It outlines that the Lynden LPOE will undergo a North-South Oriented Expansion, while the Sumas LPOE will have a Multi-Story Construction Expansion. Both plans involve acquiring additional land, as well as comprehensive site preparation and construction work. These projects are designed to improve operational efficiency and accommodate modern security and technological needs.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues and concerns arise from the document. Firstly, it does not provide specific cost estimates for these ambitious projects. This absence can raise concerns regarding accountability and the potential for fiscal inefficiencies. Furthermore, the document fails to mention which contractors or organizations will undertake the construction, potentially leading to speculation about favoritism or lack of transparency in the selection process.

The construction process, as described, seems complicated and could be challenging for non-experts to follow. It involves intricate sequencing options that might affect traffic flow and access during construction and could benefit from clearer communication. Transparency regarding environmental impacts and their mitigation, despite acknowledgment by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), could be more comprehensive. This would reassure the public that environmental concerns remain a high priority.

There is also a mention of land acquisition, which lacks detailed explanation about how this will be managed or how property owners will be compensated. Finally, with construction sequencing options still under evaluation, some may perceive planning as being incomplete at this stage.

Impact on the Public

Broadly speaking, successful modernization and expansion of these LPOEs could streamline border activities, enhance security, and reduce processing times for people and vehicles, benefiting both travelers and local economies. However, during construction, the public may experience inconveniences, particularly related to traffic disruptions and detours that could arise from the construction activities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The primary stakeholders include local communities, commuters, travelers, commercial transport entities, and property owners near the LPOEs. Local communities may face temporary disruptions due to construction but stand to benefit in the long run from improved border facilities. Commercial entities in the vicinity may experience a smoother flow of goods and reduced delays, potentially boosting economic activities.

Conversely, property owners whose lands may be acquired for these projects could face uncertainty and might have concerns about fair compensation, necessitating transparent communication and negotiations. Government agencies, including Customs and Border Protection, might significantly enhance their operational capabilities and security protocols through updated infrastructure, thereby further securing the nation's borders.

In conclusion, while the proposed modernization and expansion carry potential benefits, it is crucial for the GSA to address transparency, funding, and planning concerns to reassure and gain the confidence of the public and stakeholders.

Issues

  • • The document lacks specific information on the estimated cost for the modernization and expansion projects at the Lynden and Sumas LPOEs, which could be a concern regarding potential for wasteful spending.

  • • The document does not specify which entities or contractors are involved in the construction, leading to potential concerns about favoritism toward particular organizations.

  • • The description of the construction sequencing options and their impact on traffic flow is somewhat complex and could be challenging for general readers to comprehend quickly.

  • • Additional details on the environmental impacts and how they will be mitigated, beyond the mention of comments addressed by USEPA, would enhance transparency.

  • • The mention of potential land acquisition (both agricultural and other land types) is vague, lacking specific details on how this will be managed and how property owners will be compensated or engaged.

  • • The document states that construction sequencing options are still being evaluated and will be determined during the design-build phase, which might be seen as incomplete planning at this stage.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,347
Sentences: 55
Entities: 141

Language

Nouns: 484
Verbs: 106
Adjectives: 78
Adverbs: 27
Numbers: 67

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.87
Average Sentence Length:
24.49
Token Entropy:
5.27
Readability (ARI):
17.45

Reading Time

about 4 minutes