FR 2024-30583

Overview

Title

Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date; Michigan; St. Clair 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The EPA has decided that the air in St. Clair, Michigan now meets clean air rules for sulfur dioxide, a chemical that can make breathing hard, but they're still checking to see if everything is okay before saying so for sure. This doesn't change any rules for people or companies right now.

Summary AI

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule determining that the St. Clair, Michigan area met the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO₂) national ambient air quality standards by September 12, 2021. This decision is based on various data, including emissions and air quality reports. However, the area remains classified as nonattainment for these standards until specific criteria are met. This action, effective January 27, 2025, does not create new requirements or significantly impact small entities.

Abstract

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making a final determination that the St. Clair, MI sulfur dioxide (SO<INF>2</INF>) nonattainment area attained the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) by the date of September 12, 2021, addressing EPA's obligation under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to determine whether the area attained the 2010 SO<INF>2</INF> NAAQS attainment date. EPA proposed this action on September 26, 2024, and received no comments.

Type: Rule
Citation: 89 FR 104884
Document #: 2024-30583
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 104884-104886

AnalysisAI

The recent rule from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the Federal Register announces that the St. Clair, Michigan area has met the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO₂) national ambient air quality standards as of September 12, 2021. The culmination of this determination, based on emissions data and air quality reports, marks a significant milestone in managing air pollution standards. Nonetheless, the St. Clair area is still classified as "nonattainment" for these standards pending further actions to formalize redesignation.

General Summary

The EPA has determined that an area in St. Clair, Michigan has successfully met the established air quality standards for sulfur dioxide set in 2010 by a specified deadline. The document, while dense in regulatory language, outlines procedures and data that justify this conclusion. However, it's important to note that although the area has met this benchmark, it remains listed as a "nonattainment area" until the EPA approves a redesignation request accompanied by a plan to maintain these standards for ten years.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary issues with this document is its use of complex regulatory language, which might be challenging for those outside the legal and regulatory fields to understand fully. With references to legal codes, statutes, and executive orders, it may confuse readers unfamiliar with these citations. The phrase "the determination of attainment by the attainment date does not constitute a redesignation" highlights a potential area of misunderstanding, as it doesn't clearly convey to the average reader the distinction between reaching the standards and officially being recognized as having done so.

Moreover, the document states that no Environmental Justice (EJ) analysis was performed, which might raise questions among stakeholders about how different communities might be impacted by or benefit from the assessment. Even though the decision is considered neutral to positive, a deeper explanation could allay concerns from those in areas typically affected by environmental policies.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this document represents progress in air quality management and environmental health. Achieving the 2010 SO₂ standards suggests an improvement in the air quality of the St. Clair area, which could positively impact residents' health and quality of life. Moreover, the decision suggests that the area is on the path to being formally recognized for this achievement once further procedural requirements are met.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as local governments and industries within the St. Clair region, might view this determination as a positive development. It could mean fewer regulatory burdens in the future if formal redesignation is achieved, which might also spur economic benefits or make way for new opportunities not available in a nonattainment area.

However, small entities and local businesses might be concerned about the implications or requirements moving forward. The document asserts that no new demands are placed on them by this determination, which might provide some reassurance. Yet, understanding and navigating these regulatory landscapes can still present challenges.

Conclusion

This EPA ruling outlines a significant procedural step in managing environmental standards for sulfur dioxide in St. Clair, Michigan. While the document signifies potential health and environmental benefits, its complex language and procedural intricacies might be daunting for laypersons and stakeholders who are not well-versed in regulatory specifics. Further explanations and thoughtful communication might improve engagement and understanding among the public and interested parties.

Issues

  • • The document uses complex regulatory language, which may be difficult for a layperson to understand without additional context or explanations.

  • • The references to specific sections of legal codes and executive orders might not be clear to those unfamiliar with regulatory or legal citations.

  • • The statement 'the determination of attainment by the attainment date does not constitute a redesignation' might be ambiguous to those unfamiliar with EPA's processes, as it may not clearly convey the distinction between attainment determination and formal redesignation.

  • • The action is stated to have no federalism implications, but it might benefit from a clear explanation of why this is the case, particularly for stakeholders interested in state and local autonomy.

  • • The section on 'Environmental Justice' states that an EJ analysis was not performed, but does not provide a detailed rationale for why this analysis was considered unnecessary despite the context of the decision.

  • • The document references various Executive Orders and legal mandates without providing summaries or explanations that could help contextualize their relevance to the rulemaking.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 3
Words: 2,016
Sentences: 63
Entities: 194

Language

Nouns: 678
Verbs: 133
Adjectives: 107
Adverbs: 20
Numbers: 142

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.82
Average Sentence Length:
32.00
Token Entropy:
5.59
Readability (ARI):
20.90

Reading Time

about 7 minutes