FR 2024-30553

The document from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) details several filings concerning natural gas pipeline rates and refunds, which various companies have submitted. These filings include negotiated rate agreements, compliance issues, and requests for regulatory waivers. Public comments on these proceedings are invited until December 30, 2024, despite the filings being made only days earlier, on December 16 and 17. The opportunity for public engagement is facilitated by FERC's Office of Public Participation.

Summary of the Document

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received multiple filings by different natural gas pipeline companies. These filings revolve around rate agreements, compliance with established federal regulations, and some requests for waivers of certain regulations. Such adjustments and compliance measures are standard in the industry, aimed at ensuring that the rates and services provided by these companies remain fair, transparent, and within legal standards set by federal energy regulations.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary concerns with this document is the complexity of its language and references to specific regulatory codes, such as "§ 4(d) Rate Filing" and "Rules 211, 214, or 206". Such jargon may not be easily accessible or understandable to the general public, which could deter participation and engagement from stakeholders who are not familiar with legal or technical terminologies.

Additionally, the document raises questions about transparency. While the filings mention specific companies and agreements, there is no clear context or explanation regarding the necessity or implications of the proposed changes. Without this context, stakeholders and the public might find it challenging to grasp the potential impacts of these rate modifications and compliance filings.

Public Impact

For the general public, this document has indirect implications. Pipeline rate adjustments can ultimately affect the costs of gas and utility services, which trickle down to consumers. Therefore, it is crucial for the public to understand these changes and have the opportunity to partake in the commentary process. However, the limited timeframe for comments—just two weeks from the filing date—might not provide sufficient opportunity for stakeholders to submit considered feedback or objections.

Stakeholder Impact

Specific stakeholders, such as environmental justice communities, landowners, and tribal members, could be impacted differently by these filings. The potential for rate increases or changes in service could disproportionately affect these groups. The lack of detailed guidance on how to engage with the process may deter those who could provide meaningful input or who may be most affected by these changes.

Conversely, these procedures are essential for companies seeking to adjust their rates credibly and legally. By undergoing this process, companies aspire to ensure their operations remain compliant with federal regulations, which can enhance regulatory and market stability.

Conclusion

The document emphasizes the importance of public engagement and ensures stakeholders have a platform to express their views and concerns. However, to be effectively inclusive and participatory, there needs to be clearer communication and adequate support for those unfamiliar with regulatory processes. The Office of Public Participation is a resource provided to facilitate this, but maximizing its potential depends on public awareness and understanding of how to utilize this support effectively.

Moreover, improving the accessibility of information regarding eFiling and providing more extended periods for public commentary could lead to more inclusive and substantive participation. These measures could help balance the need for regulatory compliance with the need for public engagement and transparency.