FR 2024-30481

Overview

Title

Evaluation of National Estuarine Research Reserve; Notice of Public Meeting; Request for Comments

Agencies

ELI5 AI

NOAA is having an online meeting to talk about a special place where the ocean and land meet, and they want to know what people think about it. People can also write their ideas in an email if they can't talk during the meeting.

Summary AI

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) plans to hold a virtual public meeting on February 24, 2025, to gather input on the performance evaluation of the Jacques Cousteau National Estuarine Research Reserve (JCNERR). Members of the public are encouraged to provide oral comments during this meeting by registering as speakers or submit written feedback via email by March 7, 2025. The evaluation is part of NOAA's periodic reviews mandated by the Coastal Zone Management Act to assess whether the reserve continues to meet national standards and adhere to its management plan. More information, including past evaluation findings, is available on NOAA's website.

Abstract

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Office for Coastal Management, will hold a virtual public meeting to solicit input on the performance evaluation of the Jacques Cousteau National Estuarine Research Reserve (JCNERR). NOAA also invites the public to submit written comments.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 104087
Document #: 2024-30481
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 104087-104088

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register document outlines a public meeting organized by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) focusing on the performance evaluation of the Jacques Cousteau National Estuarine Research Reserve (JCNERR). The virtual meeting, scheduled for February 24, 2025, provides an opportunity for the public to participate and offer feedback. This evaluation is part of a series of regular reviews stipulated by the Coastal Zone Management Act, ensuring that the reserve maintains its national standards and adheres to its management strategy. Public engagement is further encouraged through written comments, which can be submitted until March 7, 2025.

General Summary

The document serves as a notice regarding NOAA's upcoming virtual meeting intended to solicit public input on the JCNERR's performance. It invites individuals to contribute by speaking during the meeting or submitting written opinions. The evaluation aims to ensure compliance with national objectives and the reserve's management plan. Additional information, such as prior evaluation findings, can be accessed through NOAA's website.

Significant Issues or Concerns

There are notable concerns regarding the process and clarity of public participation. Firstly, the document does not specify how participants can verify that their comments have been received accurately. The absence of a verification process may lead to uncertainty about whether contributions are taken into account. Furthermore, while anonymized participation is permitted, the document fails to clearly communicate how these anonymous comments will be tracked and included in the evaluation. The criteria for what constitutes "relevant" comments are also not explicitly stated, potentially leading to misunderstandings about what kind of feedback will be considered. Lastly, the language around email submissions could be made more accessible to ensure participants fully understand that their submissions will become part of the public record, which may affect privacy.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, this document indicates a chance to participate in evaluating a vital environmental reserve, affecting conservation efforts and local ecological management. The process encourages civic involvement by allowing individuals to voice their perspectives on the reserve's operations and effectiveness. However, the lack of clarity in some procedures may hinder full engagement from those unfamiliar with such bureaucratic processes, potentially limiting the inclusivity and representativeness of the feedback collected.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly associated with the JCNERR—such as local environmental groups, governmental agencies, and community residents—the document signals an opportunity to influence the reserve's management and priorities. These stakeholders may benefit from articulating their concerns or suggestions regarding how the reserve is run, which could impact subsequent policies and practices. Alternatively, potential challenges arise if these stakeholders find the comment submission process opaque or if they encounter issues in tracking their feedback's impact on the final performance evaluation.

In summary, while the document provides a framework for public involvement in a crucial evaluation process, improvements in clarity could enhance participation and ensure a more comprehensive consideration of community input.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify a clear process for how the public can verify if their comments have been received and recorded accurately.

  • • There is an ambiguity regarding how NOAA will handle the anonymity of participants in the meeting who choose to register as 'Anonymous'. It is unclear how these contributions will be tracked and documented.

  • • The document could provide more explicit details on what constitutes 'relevant' comments to ensure participants understand which input will be considered.

  • • The language and structure of information related to the submission of email comments could be simplified for clarity, especially concerning the potential public accessibility of submitted information.

  • • The document does not describe any potential follow-up actions or how the public can access the results or impact of their comments and suggestions.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 781
Sentences: 26
Entities: 63

Language

Nouns: 273
Verbs: 62
Adjectives: 43
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.30
Average Sentence Length:
30.04
Token Entropy:
5.12
Readability (ARI):
22.15

Reading Time

about 3 minutes