FR 2024-30467

General Summary

The document is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regarding an application by Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E). PG&E has requested a temporary change in the mandated water flow from the Kings penstock into Dinkey Creek. This change is part of the Haas-Kings River Hydroelectric Project in Fresno County, California. The company aims to halt certain water releases from January 6 to May 31, 2025, to conduct maintenance work, particularly replacing and testing a turbine shut-off valve. The public is invited to submit comments, protests, or requests to intervene in this matter by January 15, 2025.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary issues with the document is the lack of a comprehensive justification for the proposed variance. While maintenance work is cited, specifics regarding why the variance is essential, what alternative measures were considered, or the implications of not proceeding with the work are inadequately addressed. This lack of detail may be perceived as favoring PG&E without adequately demonstrating public benefit.

Additionally, the document's explanation regarding natural water flows and the maintenance of minimum flow requirements in the North Fork Kings River is vague. Greater detail is needed to understand the impact on local ecosystems and water-dependent activities. The use of technical terms such as "penstock," "cfs," and "dewater" further complicates understanding for those not versed in hydroelectric jargon.

The procedural instructions for public participation, including filing comments or interventions, rely on references to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) without explanations, possibly creating a barrier for those unfamiliar with these processes. Moreover, heavy reliance on external links for accessing additional information can be problematic if stakeholders lack internet access.

Lastly, the document does not sufficiently address potential environmental impacts of the variance. Details on how the variance affects the local environment during the specified period, and any mitigation efforts, are missing, leaving potential environmental concerns unexamined.

Impact on the Public

For the broader public, this document represents a bureaucratic process that may indirectly affect them, especially residents in Fresno County and those relying on water resources in the vicinity. It is crucial to provide the public with clear information and access to participate in decision-making processes that could affect local water supplies and ecosystems.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as local environmental groups, residents, and tribal communities, might be impacted by the proposed changes. Environmental groups could be concerned about the ecological balance and the effect of reduced water flows on habitats. Residents using these water sources for agriculture or recreation may worry about water availability and quality. Tribal communities, often closely connected to local waterways, might anticipate cultural and historical impacts.

On the other hand, PG&E appears as a primary beneficiary, given the maintenance work necessary for their operations. The maintenance is likely crucial for their infrastructure's safety and efficiency. However, demonstrating how this work benefits or at least minimally disrupts the broader community is important.

In conclusion, for a fair and transparent process, the document should be enhanced by providing more detailed explanations and justifications, ensuring accessible participation guidelines, and addressing potential environmental impacts comprehensively. This would better serve the public interest and address the concerns of specific stakeholders.