Overview
Title
Privacy Act of 1974; Matching Program
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The Department of Justice wants to work with the IRS to get people's addresses so they can find and collect money from people who owe the government. They promise to follow privacy laws while doing this.
Summary AI
The Department of Justice (DOJ) plans to start a program with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) called the Taxpayer Address Request (TAR), where the IRS will provide taxpayer mailing addresses to the DOJ. This information will help the DOJ locate people who owe debts to the United States to begin legal actions or collect the debts. The program is set to start on January 30, 2025, and will last for 18 months. The authority for this program comes from the Privacy Act of 1974, along with specific regulations that allow the IRS to share this information with the DOJ.
Abstract
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is issuing a public notice of its intent to conduct a computer matching program with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Department of the Treasury. Under this matching program, entitled Taxpayer Address Request (TAR), the IRS will provide information relating to taxpayers' mailing addresses to the DOJ for purposes of enabling DOJ to locate debtors to initiate litigation and/ or enforce the collection of debts owed by the taxpayers to the United States.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
Overview
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced its intention to collaborate with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in a new program named Taxpayer Address Request (TAR). This initiative aims to aid the DOJ in locating individuals who owe debts to the United States by accessing their most current mailing addresses via the IRS. The program is scheduled to commence on January 30, 2025, lasting for 18 months. Rooted in the Privacy Act of 1974 and related legal statutes, this measure seeks to bolster the DOJ's efforts in initiating legal proceedings and enforcing debt collections.
Key Concerns
While the TAR program is crafted with a specific legal underpinning, several crucial issues merit attention:
Privacy Protections: Although laws authorizing information sharing between the IRS and DOJ are cited, there is scant detail on how taxpayer privacy will be safeguarded beyond these existing legal provisions. The mechanisms for protecting sensitive data amidst these exchanges remain largely unspecified.
Security Risks: There might be apprehensions concerning the safety of the data as it flows between the IRS and DOJ. Given the sensitivity of taxpayer information, concerns surrounding data breaches or the potential for misuse of personal details are valid and warrant thorough risk assessment and mitigation strategies.
Complex Legal References: The notice integrates various legal codes and statutory references without much context or explanation, which could pose comprehension challenges for individuals not versed in legalese. This complexity might be a barrier for those seeking to understand the underlying frameworks or their implications.
Technical Language: The notice employs technical terms, particularly concerning how taxpayer identifiers like Social Security Numbers (SSNs) and Name Controls are used. For a general audience, this might impede understanding without further simplification.
Data Access and Retention: The document does not clearly outline protocols for ensuring that only authorized personnel can access the matched data or clarify the duration for which this data will be stored. Transparency in these operations would be critical for public trust.
Broader Public Impact
At a broader level, this program could significantly impact public confidence in governmental processes relating to the use and protection of personal information. Effective implementation will require a balance between enforcing debt collection and upholding rigorous privacy standards. Clear communication of protections and safeguards is necessary to reassure the public and maintain trust in governmental entities handling sensitive data.
Stakeholder Impacts
Public Stakeholders: Taxpayers owing debts to the federal government might find themselves more efficiently identified and contacted regarding their obligations. While this could expedite the resolution of outstanding debts, it might also heighten concerns over privacy and data security.
Government Agencies: For the DOJ and IRS, the program represents an opportunity to streamline processes and improve the efficiency of debt collections. However, these agencies must navigate the dual pressures of achieving operational objectives while safeguarding personal information and upholding privacy standards.
In conclusion, while the TAR program seeks to enhance the DOJ's capacity to manage federal debts, it must tread carefully, ensuring taxpayer information is well-protected and used judiciously. Addressing the potential concerns and enhancing clarity around operational details will be foundational to its successful and sustainable implementation.
Issues
• The notice mentions the use of taxpayer addresses for debt collection purposes, but there is limited information on how taxpayer privacy will be protected beyond the legal framework provided by existing laws.
• There might be concerns about the security of data exchange between the IRS and DOJ, as well as the potential for data breaches or misuse of personal information.
• The text refers to various legal codes and statutory provisions (e.g., Title 31, §§ 3711, 3717, and 3718) without detailed explanations or context, which might be difficult for non-experts to understand.
• The language used in describing the matching program (e.g., how the SSN and Name Control are used) might be overly technical for a general audience.
• The notice could be clearer on what measures are in place to ensure that only authorized personnel have access to the matched data and how long the data will be retained.