FR 2024-30423

Overview

Title

Procurement List; Additions and Deletions

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is making changes by removing some jackets, trousers, a clock, and toilet paper from a special list of things that people with disabilities make. It also means that these folks might not do some cleaning jobs at army places anymore.

Summary AI

The Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled has announced changes to the Procurement List, effective January 19, 2025. This update involves removing certain products and services that were previously provided by nonprofit agencies employing individuals who are blind or have severe disabilities. Products being deleted include various sizes of Army jackets and trousers, a wall clock, and toilet tissue. Additionally, grounds maintenance services at specific army reserve centers and engineers' headquarters will be affected. This decision is made under the provisions of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act, without significantly impacting small businesses.

Abstract

This action deletes product(s) and service(s) from the Procurement List that were furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 104107
Document #: 2024-30423
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 104107-104108

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register, prepared by the Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, announces changes to the Procurement List as of January 19, 2025. This list includes products and services provided by nonprofit agencies employing people who are blind or have severe disabilities. Changes involve removing specific products and services, such as certain cold-weather military clothing, a wall clock, toilet tissue, and grounds maintenance services.

General Summary

This notice addresses the removal of products and services from a federally maintained procurement list. These services and products were furnished by nonprofit agencies that hire individuals with severe disabilities, including those who are blind. Such changes fall under the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act, which facilitates employment opportunities for these communities. The specific items being removed include multiple variants of military jackets and trousers, a clock, toilet tissue, and grounds services.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from the document. Firstly, there is a noticeable absence of detailed explanations regarding why the specific products and services are no longer deemed suitable for federal procurement. This lack of transparency might generate questions or skepticism about the decision-making process. Additionally, the impact of these deletions on the nonprofit agencies involved is not discussed, leaving stakeholders uncertain about potential economic or employment repercussions. Furthermore, the repetitive listing of similar items, characterized by numerous NSN (National Stock Number) codes, could confuse readers and obscure understanding.

The accompanying Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification states there will be no significant impact on small businesses but fails to provide concrete data to substantiate that claim. The criteria or process utilized to decide which items are removed from procurement eligibility are also not disclosed, which could be seen as a limitation in the document's transparency and thoroughness.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, these changes might seem somewhat abstract, as they pertain primarily to government contracting and procurement activities. However, indirectly, they reflect the government's decision-making in providing opportunities for underrepresented groups. A reduction in such opportunities could potentially hamper economic inclusivity efforts for people with disabilities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For the nonprofit agencies directly affected by these deletions, the changes could have significant negative effects. Agencies that lose these contracts may face financial strain, potentially jeopardizing jobs for individuals who are blind or have severe disabilities that they employ. This could lead to fewer employment opportunities for those already confronting significant employment barriers.

Conversely, if these procurement list changes enable broader participation of smaller entities in the federal procurement process, it might open up new avenues for these businesses to supply products and services to the government. However, without clear guidelines or assistance, smaller businesses might find the opportunity difficult to leverage.

Overall, while the policy update signifies a regulatory decision with specific procedural implications, its broader social and economic effects warrant thorough consideration and clarity. Providing greater transparency could enhance understanding and acceptance among the affected groups and the public.

Issues

  • • The document lacks a detailed explanation of why certain products and services were deemed no longer suitable for procurement, which might raise questions about transparency.

  • • There is no information provided about the impact of these deletions on the nonprofit agencies that previously provided these products and services.

  • • The repetitive listing of very similar product names (e.g., multiple NSNs for similar trousers and jackets) might cause confusion or be seen as overly complex for the average reader.

  • • The Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification lacks specific data or metrics to support the claim that there is no significant impact on small entities.

  • • The document does not provide information on the criteria or process used to determine the suitability of products and services for procurement list inclusion or deletion.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,723
Sentences: 21
Entities: 251

Language

Nouns: 683
Verbs: 29
Adjectives: 25
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 231

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.19
Average Sentence Length:
82.05
Token Entropy:
4.54
Readability (ARI):
41.71

Reading Time

about 11 minutes