FR 2024-30398

Overview

Title

Public Meeting of the Ocean Exploration Advisory Board

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is having an online meeting to talk about exploring the ocean, and anyone can watch it on the internet. They will share ideas on how to do this better, but the details on joining the meeting or how everyone's feedback will be used aren't very clear yet.

Summary AI

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has announced a virtual meeting for the Ocean Exploration Advisory Board (OEAB) scheduled for January 10, 2025. The meeting will focus on reviewing and discussing the Federal ocean exploration program, emphasizing three areas: ensuring a national program for ocean exploration, technological innovation and application, and public engagement and education. During the meeting, the OEAB will validate and potentially approve their findings and recommendations, which will then be shared with NOAA leadership. The public can attend the meeting online, and details will be available on the OEAB website.

Abstract

This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda for a meeting of the Ocean Exploration Advisory Board (OEAB). OEAB members will discuss and provide advice on the Federal ocean exploration program, with a particular emphasis on the topics identified in the section on Matters to Be Considered.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 104106
Document #: 2024-30398
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 104106-104107

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register has published a notice from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) regarding an upcoming meeting of the Ocean Exploration Advisory Board (OEAB). This virtual gathering, scheduled for January 10, 2025, aims to review the Federal ocean exploration program, focusing on three crucial aspects: establishing a national program for ocean exploration, fostering technological advancements, and enhancing public engagement and education.

Summary and Purpose

The OEAB is a vital group providing strategic advice to NOAA's leadership on ocean exploration initiatives. This meeting is an opportunity for the board members to consolidate their findings from a prior program review and submit recommendations to the NOAA Administrator. These findings and discussions are intended to guide the national efforts in ocean exploration, aim for technological innovations, and improve public involvement.

Key Issues and Concerns

While the meeting's virtual nature ensures broader access, there are several concerns regarding the accessibility and transparency of the process:

  • Access to the Meeting: The notice specifies that information on how to attend the virtual meeting will be available on the OEAB's official website. However, the absence of direct access details in the document might lead to difficulties for the public if there are issues with the website's clarity or timeliness in providing the necessary links.

  • Public Participation and Feedback: The format limits public comments to three minutes per speaker, which might restrict the depth of feedback. Ensuring comprehensive public engagement is challenging within such constraints. There's also a lack of clarity on how public input will be integrated into the board's final decisions, which might affect transparency and trust.

  • Technological Considerations: The document lacks specifics on the platforms or tools that will facilitate the virtual meeting. This could pose another barrier if the chosen platform is not user-friendly or accessible to a significant portion of the public.

  • Board Member Representation: The selection criteria for OEAB members, who represent various stakeholders, are not disclosed. This could result in concerns surrounding potential biases or a lack of balanced representation from all relevant sectors.

Broad Public Impact

The meeting has the potential to significantly influence public policy and spending on ocean exploration. By addressing technological innovations and improving public engagement, the outcomes of these discussions can shape the national and regional strategies used to explore and understand oceanic environments.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For the scientific community and technology developers, this meeting is crucial as it may signal strategic priorities and opportunities for future research funding and partnerships. Non-profits and advocacy groups interested in ocean conservation and education may have an opportunity to influence the agenda through public comments, albeit brief, which can be impactful if well-articulated.

However, the limited detail on how feedback will be used creates uncertainty for stakeholders wishing to contribute. Moreover, the absence of clear criteria for board membership may affect stakeholder trust, especially if they feel their interests are underrepresented.

In conclusion, while this virtual meeting presents a valuable opportunity for advancing ocean exploration priorities, ensuring accessibility, meaningful public engagement, and transparent processes are essential to build comprehensive support and achieve effective outcomes.

Issues

  • • The document specifies that the meeting will be virtual, but does not give direct details on how to access it except through the OEAB website, which could lead to accessibility issues if the website is not clear or if there are any issues with updating it in time.

  • • The stated time for public comments is limited to three minutes per individual or group, which might not be sufficient for detailed concerns or suggestions, potentially limiting comprehensive public engagement.

  • • There is no specific mention of how effectively the feedback or recommendations from the public will be considered or integrated into final decisions, which could raise transparency concerns.

  • • Information on the technological platforms used for the virtual meeting is lacking, which could affect participation if the platform chosen is not widely accessible or user-friendly.

  • • The criteria for selecting OEAB members representing different stakeholders are not explicitly mentioned, which may raise concerns about potential bias in representation.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 714
Sentences: 24
Entities: 58

Language

Nouns: 260
Verbs: 53
Adjectives: 29
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 30

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.29
Average Sentence Length:
29.75
Token Entropy:
5.06
Readability (ARI):
21.94

Reading Time

about 2 minutes