FR 2024-30241

Overview

Title

Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The CDC is having a secret online meeting to talk about funding schools that teach people to stay safe and healthy at work. They need to keep it private because they will discuss important and private information.

Summary AI

Notice has been given for a closed meeting of the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel on February 24-25, 2025. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will use a video-assisted format to review grant applications related to Occupational Safety and Health Education and Research Centers. The meeting will remain private to protect trade secrets and personal information. Concerns or inquiries can be directed to Dr. Michael Goldcamp, the Scientific Review Officer at the CDC.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 103831
Document #: 2024-30241
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 103831-103831

AnalysisAI

This document is a notice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), pertaining to an upcoming closed meeting scheduled for February 24-25, 2025. The meeting is part of the activities of the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel. Specifically, this session focuses on reviewing grant applications related to Occupational Safety and Health Education and Research Centers.

General Summary

The CDC has announced a closed video-assisted meeting organized to evaluate grant applications. The meeting is authorized to be private following certain U.S. laws that allow such confidentiality in order to protect sensitive information. The closed nature of the meeting ensures that details like trade secrets, commercial properties, and personal individual details associated with the grant applications remain secure.

Significant Issues or Concerns

A significant aspect of this announcement is its emphasis on the confidentiality of the proceedings. The notice underlines the legal backing for keeping the meeting closed, which is rooted in protecting sensitive commercial and personal data. Such secrecy, while legally justified, might raise questions about transparency and accountability in the public sphere, as stakeholders external to the process have limited insight into the decision-making procedures for these critical grants.

Public Impact

For the general public, this closed meeting may seem distant or intangible, as it largely deals with specialized topics within occupational safety and health. However, these discussions can have wide-ranging impacts. Occupational Safety and Health Education and Research Centers play a vital role in advancing workplace safety standards and public health. Thus, the outcomes from such meetings could indirectly affect workplace environments and safety protocols, potentially enhancing public health and safety metrics.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

From the perspective of stakeholders directly involved, such as institutions applying for the grants and individuals working within the Occupational Safety and Health fields, the meeting holds profound implications. For grant applicants, these reviews are crucial moments that could secure necessary funding for research and development. Positive outcomes from this meeting could lead to advancements in safety technologies and methodologies, directly benefiting workers and employers.

Conversely, those who find their applications unsuccessful might be adversely affected if their research cannot proceed. Furthermore, the scientific and academic community has a vested interest in the decisions made during these meetings, as they can influence the direction of research and funding priorities within occupational health and safety.

In conclusion, while the announcement of a closed CDC meeting for grant review might seem procedural, it signifies important decision-making that potentially shapes public health policies and research funding landscapes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 394
Sentences: 13
Entities: 35

Language

Nouns: 157
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 27

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.30
Average Sentence Length:
30.31
Token Entropy:
4.68
Readability (ARI):
21.96

Reading Time

about a minute or two