FR 2024-30079

Overview

Title

National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; Notice of Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering is having a special meeting online where anyone can listen in during some parts, but then they will have a secret talk about important papers people gave them, which they promise to keep private.

Summary AI

The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering is holding a meeting of the National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering on January 22, 2025. The meeting is public and will be accessible online from 12:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. However, from 2:45 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., the meeting will be closed to review and evaluate grant applications, as this part might involve confidential information. Anyone interested can submit written comments to the committee, and further details about the meeting will be available on their website.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 103849
Document #: 2024-30079
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 103849-103849

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register announces a meeting of the National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. This meeting, scheduled for January 22, 2025, consists of two parts: an open session that welcomes public attendance via videoconference, and a closed session intended to handle sensitive and confidential information. The open portion will take place from 12:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m., providing updates from the Institute Director and other staff, while the closed session from 2:45 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. will focus on reviewing grant applications and proposals.

Summary of the Document

The notice informs the public about a forthcoming advisory council meeting which they can attend virtually. The agenda during the open section includes discussions led by the Institute Director and council members, making it an opportunity for the public to gain insights into the council’s activities and objectives. The meeting will later shift to a closed session to maintain the confidentiality required in evaluating sensitive material, such as proprietary data and personal information related to grant applications.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from the document. Firstly, while the notice explains that the closed portion involves reviewing grant applications with potentially confidential material, it does not elaborate on the nature of these confidentiality concerns. This lack of detail could lead to questioning transparency. Secondly, although contact information is provided, it is limited to an email address, which may not suffice for all individuals, especially those who prefer or require voice communication.

Additionally, the document does not specify an agenda for the closed session, which could prompt questions regarding oversight and the reasons behind closing this portion of the meeting. Moreover, there's no mention of accessibility accommodations for individuals with disabilities in accessing the virtual meeting or videocast, potentially limiting participation for some individuals.

Impact on the Public

The notification of this meeting serves as a crucial channel for public engagement and transparency regarding developments in biomedical imaging and bioengineering. It provides a platform for stakeholders and interested individuals to observe the proceedings, understand the council's priorities, and potentially influence policy through submitted comments.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in biomedical research, such as academic institutions and biotech companies, this meeting might be especially significant. It offers an opportunity to gain insight into the council’s priorities and funding considerations, which could impact their strategic planning and grant application strategies. Meanwhile, the general public can benefit from this process through advancements that arise from research funded through these grants.

However, the lack of detailed agendas or accessibility information might limit the effectiveness of stakeholder engagement, possibly leading to a feeling of exclusion for those unable to access the meeting or who wish for greater transparency. Addressing these issues could enhance trust and improve the inclusiveness of the process.

Issues

  • • The document does not clearly explain the reason for the meeting being closed other than mentioning confidentiality, which could be detailed further to ensure transparency.

  • • The contact information provided includes an email but not a phone number, which may limit accessibility for individuals who prefer or require verbal communication.

  • • The document lacks a detailed agenda for the closed portion of the meeting, which might raise questions about transparency and oversight.

  • • There is no mention of accessibility accommodations for individuals with disabilities regarding the videocast or virtual meeting access.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 434
Sentences: 18
Entities: 41

Language

Nouns: 159
Verbs: 20
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 3
Numbers: 29

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.91
Average Sentence Length:
24.11
Token Entropy:
4.84
Readability (ARI):
21.82

Reading Time

about a minute or two