FR 2024-30022

Overview

Title

Notice of Closed Meeting

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The CDC is having a private online meeting in March to talk about who should get money to learn about keeping workers safe. They want to keep it private because it might involve personal information.

Summary AI

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced a closed meeting of the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel. The meeting is scheduled for March 4, 2025, and will be held via video conference. The purpose of this meeting is to review and evaluate grant applications related to Occupational Safety and Health Training Project Grants. Due to the potential disclosure of confidential or personal information, the meeting will not be open to the public.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 102910
Document #: 2024-30022
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 102910-102910

AnalysisAI

The document is a notice of a closed meeting organized by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to be held on March 4, 2025. This meeting involves the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel and is specifically set to review and evaluate grant applications for the Occupational Safety and Health Training Project Grants. Due to the confidential nature of the information involved, such as trade secrets or personal details, the meeting will not be open to the public.

Summary of the Document

The notice issued under citation 89 FR 102910 outlines a scheduled event by the CDC, indicating that a panel will be meeting via video conference to evaluate grant applications. As it is a closed meeting, the public is not permitted to attend. The objective is to protect sensitive information that could involve trade secrets or private information about individuals linked to the grant applications.

Significant Issues and Concerns

There are several notable points of concern with this notice:

  1. Transparency and Fairness: The document does not offer detailed information about the selection criteria or process for the grant applications. This lack of detail may lead to skepticism regarding the transparency and fairness of the decision-making process.

  2. Justification for Closure: The justification for closing the meeting relies on potential disclosure of confidential business and personal information. While this is a valid concern, it may not fully satisfy public demands for transparency, particularly in a process involving public funds.

  3. Complex Language: The notice employs legal jargon and references specific sections of the U.S. Code (U.S.C.) without sufficient explanation, potentially making it challenging for individuals without a legal background to fully understand.

  4. Delegation of Authority: The notice mentions the delegation of authority to sign Federal Register notices without providing context on why this delegation is necessary or how it maintains accountability within the CDC.

  5. Security Concerns: Contact information for further inquiries includes a personal email address but lacks specification regarding the security and official nature of using such a communication method, which may raise privacy concerns.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, the impact of this document on the public is relatively limited due to the closure of the meeting. Members of the public interested in occupational safety and health may feel excluded from an essential part of the grant application process that uses public funds. This could lead to concerns regarding how effectively resources are being allocated and utilized.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders such as academic institutions or non-profit organizations vying for these grants, the closed nature of the meeting might cause apprehension about the transparency of the evaluation procedures. However, protecting sensitive information is a legitimate concern that, if not managed properly, could adversely affect applicants by exposing trade secrets. Additionally, by holding the meeting via video conference, the CDC provides a flexible approach that could enhance participation from diverse geographic locations, benefitting stakeholders from various regions.

In conclusion, while the notice performs its essential function by informing about the meeting, some aspects around transparency, language complexity, and security practices could be improved to better serve the public's interest and assure stakeholders of a fair and secure process.

Issues

  • • The notice mentions a closed meeting to review and evaluate grant applications without providing any specific details about the selection criteria or process, which can raise concerns about transparency and fairness.

  • • There is no specific justification provided for why the meeting is closed other than the potential disclosure of confidential trade secrets and personal privacy, which might not be sufficient for some members of the public concerned about transparency.

  • • The document uses legal and bureaucratic language that might be difficult for the general public to fully understand, such as references to specific U.S.C. sections without explanation.

  • • There might be concerns about whether the delegation of authority to sign Federal Register notices to the Director is adequately justified or structured, indicating a potential for lack of accountability.

  • • The contact information lists a personal email address without clarification on how secure or official that mode of communication is, raising potential privacy and security issues.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 389
Sentences: 13
Entities: 35

Language

Nouns: 156
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 26

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.33
Average Sentence Length:
29.92
Token Entropy:
4.69
Readability (ARI):
21.92

Reading Time

about a minute or two