FR 2024-29980

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received some paperwork about gas pipelines, and they are saying people can join in and share their thoughts online by a certain date. Some of the details might be tricky to understand, especially for those who aren't used to this kind of stuff.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has received several filings related to natural gas pipelines. These include compliance filings from Bear Creek Storage Company and Columbia Gas Transmission regarding annual fuel summaries and penalty revenue crediting reports. For those interested in participating in these cases, the deadline to submit comments or intervene was specified as December 23 and 24, 2024, depending on the filing. The filings are accessible online, and more information on how to participate can be found on the Commission's website.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 102885
Document #: 2024-29980
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 102885-102885

AnalysisAI

The document in question announces filings received by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) concerning natural gas pipeline activities. These filings include compliance submissions from companies such as Bear Creek Storage Company, Columbia Gas Transmission, and Columbia Gulf Transmission, highlighting issues like annual fuel summaries and penalty revenue crediting reports. Additionally, Southern Natural Gas Company has submitted an update related to a rate case, correcting its previous filing. The filings are crucial as they relate to regulatory compliance and financial considerations within the natural gas industry.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A primary concern within the document is the lack of clarity regarding the effective dates for these compliance filings. Effective dates are critical for stakeholders to understand when new rules or adjustments take place; their absence could lead to uncertainties or delays in implementation. Additionally, the document does not specify the financial ramifications of the pipeline rate and refund reports. Without concrete monetary amounts, it is challenging for stakeholders to gauge the fiscal impact, potentially obscuring any financial irregularities or unnecessary expenditures.

Another notable concern is the requirement for intervention to become an official party to these proceedings. This requirement could disproportionately favor entities with legal expertise or financial resources, potentially excluding smaller participants or individual stakeholders who lack such advantages. The language and structure of the document predominantly use technical jargon, which might be difficult for individuals without a legal or regulatory background to comprehend.

The document references specific regulatory rules without providing explanations, which may alienate laypersons or newcomers to these proceedings. There is also a lack of context or background about the docket numbers and filings, which could be seen as opaque and might deter public engagement and understanding.

Impact on the Public and Stakeholders

For the broader public, especially those uninterested or uninformed about regulatory proceedings, this document might not seem immediately impactful. However, decisions and changes stemming from these filings can influence natural gas prices and availability, indirectly affecting consumers' cost of living or energy expenses.

Specific stakeholders, such as natural gas companies, legal professionals in the energy sector, and environmental organizations, may find this document crucial. The filings could have direct financial implications for businesses involved, affecting bottom lines and strategy. It may also offer opportunities for environmental groups to interject concerns or support related legal arguments.

Despite the challenges mentioned, access to such documents demonstrates a commitment to a transparent regulatory process. The Commission's Office of Public Participation supports citizens wishing to engage in these processes, highlighting a positive step towards inclusivity and broader public involvement. Nonetheless, for these efforts to be genuinely effective, there should be an ongoing consideration of the accessibility and clarity of such communications, ensuring that all interested parties can participate meaningfully.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the effective dates for the compliance filings, which might lead to confusion or delay in implementation.

  • • The document does not state specific monetary amounts or financial implications associated with the pipeline rate and refund reports, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.

  • • The requirement for intervention to become a party to the proceeding may favor those with legal resources or experience, potentially disadvantaging smaller entities or individuals without such resources.

  • • The language used is technical and may be difficult for individuals without expertise in regulatory filings or legal proceedings to understand.

  • • The notice includes references to specific rules (Rules 211, 214, or 206) without providing a summary or explanation, which could hinder understanding for laypersons.

  • • The document refers to various docket numbers and proceedings, but does not provide context or background information on these cases, which could be seen as lacking transparency for those not familiar with the docket numbers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 619
Sentences: 27
Entities: 65

Language

Nouns: 215
Verbs: 35
Adjectives: 21
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 55

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.82
Average Sentence Length:
22.93
Token Entropy:
4.88
Readability (ARI):
20.38

Reading Time

about 2 minutes