FR 2024-29949

Overview

Title

Notice of Inventory Completion: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Peabody Museum at Harvard University found hair clippings from two Blackfeet children who went to a school long ago, and they are working to give them back to the Blackfeet Tribe. People can ask for the hair back until January 17, 2025, and the museum will decide who should get them if more than one person asks.

Summary AI

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University has completed an inventory of human remains and found a cultural connection to the Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana. The remains consist of hair clippings from two 15-year-old individuals identified as Blackfoot, collected by James T. Ryan between 1930 and 1933 at the Chemawa Indian School in Oregon. The museum is facilitating the repatriation process, and requests for the return of the remains can be submitted until January 17, 2025. If multiple requests are submitted, the museum will determine the most appropriate recipient.

Abstract

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University (PMAE) has completed an inventory of human remains and has determined that there is a cultural affiliation between the human remains and Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations in this notice. The human remains were collected at the Chemawa (Salem) Indian School, Marion County, OR.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 102946
Document #: 2024-29949
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 102946-102947

AnalysisAI

In reviewing the recent document from the Federal Register, it is important to understand its contents and the possible implications it holds for various stakeholders.

General Overview

The Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University has completed an inventory of Native American human remains in accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The document identifies human remains, specifically hair clippings from two young individuals believed to be of the Blackfoot, now associated with the Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation in Montana. These remains were collected historically from the Chemawa Indian School in Oregon and are now ready for repatriation, allowing for requests to be submitted until January 17, 2025.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A few notable concerns are present within this notice:

  1. Lack of Consultation Details: The document does not specify the consultation process involved, including which entities were consulted or how cultural affiliation was exactly determined. This omission leaves stakeholders guessing about the thoroughness of the process.

  2. Criteria for Cultural Affiliation: The notice refers to a "reasonable connection" between the human remains and the Blackfeet Tribe but fails to explain the methodology or criteria used to reach this conclusion.

  3. Handling Competing Requests: There is a lack of clarity on how competing repatriation requests will be evaluated. The absence of defined criteria leaves room for ambiguity and potential disputes.

  4. Complex Legal References: While the document references legal provisions (e.g., 25 U.S.C. 3003, 43 CFR 10.10), it offers no explanation or context. This is a potential hurdle for those who are not legally trained, making the document less accessible to non-experts.

  5. Repatriation Date Justification: The choice of January 17, 2025, as the starting date for potential repatriation is not explained, which could lead to uncertainty for stakeholders who are planning for repatriation.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this notice reinforces the ongoing commitment to honoring the cultural and ancestral significance of human remains belonging to Native American tribes. The process under NAGPRA plays a crucial role in rectifying historical injustices by ensuring remains are respectfully returned to their rightful communities.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For Native American tribes, particularly the Blackfeet Tribe, this document carries a positive prospect of reclaiming ancestral remains. It is a move towards cultural restoration and respecting tribal sovereignty. However, the lack of detailed procedural information can lead to skepticism or mistrust about the fairness and transparency of the repatriation process. Additionally, for museums and federal institutions, this represents their legal obligation to community engagement and cultural sensitivity under NAGPRA.

Conclusion: While the notice signifies a positive step towards the repatriation of Native American remains, it also highlights the need for a more detailed transparent process. Addressing these gaps can strengthen trust and ensure a more equitable and respectful repatriation procedure.

Issues

  • • The document lacks specific information on the consultation process, such as which entities were consulted and how the cultural affiliation was specifically determined.

  • • The document does not specify the method or criteria used to assess the 'reasonable connection' between the human remains and the Blackfeet Tribe.

  • • There is an ambiguity regarding how 'competing requests for repatriation' will be evaluated and what criteria will be used to determine 'the most appropriate requestor'.

  • • The complex legal references (e.g., 25 U.S.C. 3003, 43 CFR 10.10) are mentioned without providing explanations or context, which might be difficult for a layperson to understand.

  • • The document does not provide any information on the reasoning behind the date of January 17, 2025, for potential repatriation, which might create confusion for stakeholders waiting for a timeline explanation.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 696
Sentences: 30
Entities: 71

Language

Nouns: 223
Verbs: 50
Adjectives: 43
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.98
Average Sentence Length:
23.20
Token Entropy:
4.90
Readability (ARI):
17.21

Reading Time

about 2 minutes