FR 2024-29944

General Summary

The document serves as an official notice from Vanderbilt University concerning the inventory of human remains under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The university identified remains of at least 86 Native American individuals, which were uncovered at the Ganier site near Nashville, Tennessee. However, the institution has been unable to determine any lineal descendants or establish any cultural affiliation with Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations. Repatriation requests for these remains can be made, with the process slated to begin on or after January 17, 2025. Vanderbilt University will manage these requests, adjudicating any competing claims to determine the most appropriate recipient.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several concerns emerge from the notice. First, the document doesn't specify what happens to the remains if no repatriation requests are received by the January 17, 2025 deadline. This lack of information could create uncertainty for interested parties. Additionally, the criteria by which Vanderbilt University will determine the "most appropriate requestor" in cases of multiple requests lack transparency and clarity, which could lead to confusion or dispute among potential claimants.

The notice's language, particularly regarding the phrase "may occur on or after January 17, 2025," is vague, leaving readers questioning what exactly triggers the repatriation process. The consultation process with Indian Tribes also seems unclear since no tribe was ultimately connected to the remains despite discussions having taken place. Moreover, the intricate terminology around "cultural affiliation" may not be easily accessible to a lay audience, potentially necessitating further explanation or simplification.

Lastly, the document does not address what actions may be taken if a cultural affiliation is established in the future, an omission that could have important implications for how such cases are handled.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this document upholds the principles of NAGPRA, ensuring respectful treatment and potential return of ancestral remains. While it demonstrates regulatory compliance, the document can impact public perceptions, especially regarding the sensitivity and respect with which human remains are managed. It places an emphasis on involving relevant Tribes or organizations in consultation, reflecting a commitment to collaboration and cultural respect.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The impact on specific stakeholders, such as Indian Tribes potentially connected to the remains, can be both positive and negative. Positively, the document provides a formal process for repatriation and acknowledges the need for consultation, potentially offering Tribes an opportunity to reclaim ancestral remains. However, the determination that no Tribe is connected to the remains, despite consultations, may be disheartening for those seeking cultural ties to the past.

For Vanderbilt University, this process highlights its dedication to handling archaeological and cultural discoveries with care. However, the ambiguity in the processes and criteria delineated in the document could present challenges, necessitating a clear, transparent approach to addressing claims.

Overall, while the document adheres to legal requirements, it raises questions about procedural specifics that stakeholders would need clarified to fully assess their roles and responsibilities within this framework.