FR 2024-29682

Overview

Title

Adoption of 2020 Core Based Statistical Area Standards; Correction

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Housing and Urban Development needed to fix a mistake in their rules for organizing cities, where some numbers got mixed up. They corrected it so everything is in the right order now, and this fix will start working next year.

Summary AI

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued a correction to a final rule titled "Adoption of 2020 Core Based Statistical Area Standards," originally published in the Federal Register on December 6, 2024. The correction addresses errors in the numbering of paragraphs in the rule, specifically in Section 5.3001, where two instances of paragraph (e) and paragraph (f) were mistakenly numbered. The document redesignates these duplicate paragraphs to ensure the rule's accuracy and clarity. The correction takes effect on January 6, 2025.

Abstract

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is correcting a final rule entitled, "Adoption of 2020 Core Based Statistical Area Standards" that published in the Federal Register on December 6, 2024.

Type: Rule
Citation: 89 FR 101880
Document #: 2024-29682
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 101880-101881

AnalysisAI

Overview

The document in question is a correction issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regarding a previous rule about the "Adoption of 2020 Core Based Statistical Area Standards." Initially published on December 6, 2024, this correction addresses errors specifically related to the paragraph numbering in the rule. Effective on January 6, 2025, the correction ensures accurate reference and application by redesignating duplicated paragraphs within the legal text.

Significant Issues and Concerns

The document presents a few notable issues:

  1. Timeline Concerns: The short timeframe between the initial publication of the rule on December 6, 2024, and the correction dated December 17, 2024, suggests a swift process in identifying and addressing errors. While efficiency is beneficial, the rushed nature may imply limited time for thorough public review and comment.

  2. Lack of Context: The correction notice does not explain the consequences of the numbering errors. Understanding why corrections are necessary and what potential issues they prevent is vital, especially for stakeholders relying on precise legal language for compliance.

  3. Technical Language: Legal documents tend to use technical language and references, such as specific legal citations, that may not be easily understood by the general public. This document could benefit from simplified or additional explanations to enhance public comprehension.

  4. Accessibility of Contact Information: Although the document provides contact information and references telecommunications relay services for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, directing such individuals to a website might not be the most user-friendly option. Offering more direct contact methods would be more inclusive.

Impact on the Public

This correction primarily affects individuals and entities involved in housing and urban development sectors that need to adhere to federal guidelines outlined by HUD. By rectifying the paragraph numbering, the document aims to prevent misinterpretation of the regulation, thus ensuring compliance and avoiding legal disputes. However, the lack of detailed context on the correction might leave some stakeholders unclear about the significance of these changes.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

  • Legal Professionals and Administrators: For those interpreting and applying these regulations, such as legal professionals, policy administrators, and governmental agencies, clear and accurate legal documentation is essential. This correction should provide clarity and help them apply the rules accurately.

  • Urban Developers and Planners: These stakeholders may rely on CBSA standards for planning and development activities. Ensuring precise legal guidelines will help them align their projects with federal expectations, minimize risks, and maintain regulatory compliance.

  • General Public: Most citizens may not directly feel the impact of this administrative correction. However, any improvements in the accuracy of regulations can contribute to better-managed urban development, indirectly benefiting local communities through more organized and efficient planning.

Overall, while the document addresses a technical issue, its implications emphasize the necessity for precise legal guidelines in governmental operations and the importance of making such corrections accessible and understandable to all stakeholders involved.

Issues

  • • The publication dates appear to be inconsistent. The final rule is stated to have been published on December 6, 2024, but the correction is dated December 17, 2024, which is a very short timeframe for identifying errors and publishing corrections. This may cause confusion or imply a rushed process.

  • • There is no context or explanation provided regarding the potential impact of the errors being corrected. It would be beneficial to clarify why these corrections are necessary and what issues they might prevent.

  • • The document uses technical language and references specific legal citations (e.g., '§ 5.3001'). While this might be clear for legal experts, additional explanation or simplification might be necessary for the general public to understand the implications.

  • • The contact information section mentions telecommunications access for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, but it could provide more direct information on how such individuals can contact HUD without needing to visit the external FCC site.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 453
Sentences: 16
Entities: 53

Language

Nouns: 144
Verbs: 29
Adjectives: 18
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 43

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.61
Average Sentence Length:
28.31
Token Entropy:
4.87
Readability (ARI):
17.50

Reading Time

about a minute or two