FR 2024-29670

Overview

Title

Combined Notice of Filings

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is looking at some changes about how big pipes that carry gas charge money, and some companies want to stop sharing their pipe space. They're also checking if Bear Creek's report about using fuel is okay, and people can say what they think by certain dates.

Summary AI

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has announced new filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refunds. Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC and Enable Oklahoma Intrastate Transmission, LLC are seeking authorization to abandon a capacity lease agreement and a limited jurisdiction certificate. Meanwhile, Bear Creek Storage Company, LLC has submitted a compliance filing for their Annual Fuel Summary 2024. The public has deadlines to comment or protest by specified dates, and more information can be accessed online or by contacting the Office of Public Participation for assistance.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 102125
Document #: 2024-29670
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 102125-102126

AnalysisAI

The document under review from the Federal Register is a notice by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) concerning filings related to natural gas pipeline rates and refund reports. These proceedings involve companies like Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, Enable Oklahoma Intrastate Transmission, LLC, and Bear Creek Storage Company, LLC, with specific regulatory compliance and authorization requests.

General Summary

The document lists several filings that have been submitted to FERC. Notably, Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, alongside Enable Oklahoma Intrastate Transmission, seeks authorization to abandon a capacity lease agreement and obtain a limited jurisdiction certificate. There is also mention of Bear Creek Storage Company making a compliance filing pertaining to its Annual Fuel Summary for 2024. The public has been invited to comment on these filings by specific deadlines. Additionally, other regulatory and procedural details are provided, along with information on accessing filings through FERC's online platform.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the primary concerns is that the document is written in technical language, which may not be easily understood by the general public. This complexity can limit meaningful public participation, even though the document invites such involvement. Furthermore, it references specific FERC regulations without explanation, assuming that readers have an understanding of these rules.

Another point of concern is the lack of detailed information regarding the financial implications of the filings. The document does not provide an analysis of potential costs or benefits, which hinders the public’s ability to assess any wasteful spending associated with these regulatory changes. Similarly, the implications of abandoning a Capacity Lease Agreement are not clear, posing potential risks and uncertainties for stakeholders who rely on such agreements.

The absence of an effective date for Bear Creek Storage Company’s compliance filing could lead to confusion about when the provisions are applicable. This lack of clarity can cause stakeholders to misinterpret the timeline for compliance and adjustment.

Impact on the Public

The implications of this notice extend to the broader public by potentially affecting energy rates and service availability. For individuals residing in areas served by the companies involved, such changes could impact household energy budgets. Given the technical nature of the document and the procedures for participation, the public might find it challenging to effectively engage and express concerns or support.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For companies involved in these filings, the notice signifies potential changes to their operational landscapes and regulatory obligations. Abandonment of a Capacity Lease Agreement could alter service provisions, affecting those who rely on the pipeline for natural gas transport.

On a positive note, stakeholders who are well-versed in regulatory language and procedures, such as industry experts or legal professionals, might find opportunities to participate in shaping the outcome of these proceedings.

The Office of Public Participation offers a resource for those needing assistance to navigate these proceedings. However, the document lacks details on how this office facilitates better understanding and engagement for non-expert stakeholders.

In summary, while the document provides important regulatory information, its technical nature and lack of transparency on specific issues may limit public engagement and understanding. Ensuring broader access to comprehensible information and implications could enhance the effectiveness of public participation in such regulatory matters.

Issues

  • • The document lists several filings but does not specify the potential financial implications or any cost analysis, making it difficult to assess if there is wasteful spending.

  • • The language detailing the procedures for filing interventions or protests is highly technical and may not be easily understood by the general public, potentially limiting meaningful participation.

  • • The document does not provide a clear explanation of the implications or context of abandoning a Capacity Lease Agreement, which could be crucial information for stakeholders.

  • • The absence of a specific effective date for the compliance filing by Bear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C., marked as 'N/A,' may lead to confusion or misinterpretation regarding its applicability.

  • • The document assumes familiarity with FERC regulations and procedures, which may not be the case for all readers, posing a barrier to engagement.

  • • Though the document invites public participation via the Office of Public Participation, it does not elaborate on how this office actively facilitates or improves access and understanding for laypersons.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 591
Sentences: 32
Entities: 62

Language

Nouns: 202
Verbs: 35
Adjectives: 19
Adverbs: 2
Numbers: 53

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.72
Average Sentence Length:
18.47
Token Entropy:
4.99
Readability (ARI):
17.77

Reading Time

about 2 minutes