FR 2024-29668

Overview

Title

DCP Operating Company, LP; Notice of Petition for Declaratory Order

Agencies

ELI5 AI

DCP Operating Company wants to buy some pipelines in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas, and they are asking a government group called FERC to say these pipelines are for "gathering" gas, so FERC won't control them. People have until January 10, 2025, to say if they agree or disagree with DCP's idea.

Summary AI

DCP Operating Company, LP has filed a petition for a declaratory order with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). They are requesting that FERC find that certain pipeline facilities they are acquiring in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas will perform a gathering function and not be subject to FERC's jurisdiction under the Natural Gas Act. Interested parties who want to intervene or protest must submit their filings by January 10, 2025. FERC promotes electronic submissions but allows paper submissions under specific guidelines.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 102125
Document #: 2024-29668
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 102125-102125

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The document from the Federal Register details a filing by DCP Operating Company, LP with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). DCP Operating seeks a declaratory order stating that a set of pipelines it plans to acquire in Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas should be classified as performing a "gathering function." This classification denotes that the pipelines would be exempt from FERC's jurisdiction, particularly under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act. Stakeholders interested in the proceedings have until January 10, 2025, to submit comments or intervene in the case.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One notable concern is the lack of detail on why DCP Operating believes these pipelines should be considered gathering lines. The document does not explain the criteria being used to establish the classification, leaving readers without a clear understanding of the reasoning or implications.

Furthermore, the procedural rules for intervention or protest might be daunting for people not already familiar with FERC's processes. There is an assumption that readers understand terms like "gathering function" and specific regulatory references, which might not be readily accessible to all. Additionally, the document lacks an abstract, which could have helped clarify its contents and intent more immediately for readers.

Impact on the Public

The document can significantly impact residents and businesses in the areas where these pipelines are located. If the pipelines are indeed classified as performing a gathering function, regulatory oversight could be reduced, potentially affecting safety and environmental standards. Understanding these potential changes can be challenging for the general public due to the document’s technical nature and lack of explanatory detail.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For DCP Operating, a favorable decision from FERC could streamline their operations by removing further regulatory hurdles and potentially reducing costs. This outcome is also likely to benefit companies involved in upstream oil and gas production, as it may result in decreased transportation costs or increased efficiency.

Conversely, if pipelines are exempt from FERC's jurisdiction, local communities, environmental groups, and landowners might have concerns about safety and environmental protection due to reduced federal oversight. Stakeholders who maintain vigilance over energy infrastructure compliance may worry about the proper management of these systems and the possible implications for land use and environmental standards.

In conclusion, while the document presents a procedural step for DCP Operating Company, it leaves significant questions unanswered for the broader public and specific interest groups. Greater transparency and clarity could better facilitate public engagement and understanding of the implications of such regulatory decisions.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the reasons or basis for DCP Operating Company, LP's belief that the acquired pipeline facilities will perform a gathering function and not fall under the Commission's jurisdiction. More context or details would help in understanding their claim.

  • • The process for intervention or protest might be unclear to individuals unfamiliar with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's rules, potentially discouraging public participation.

  • • The notice does not indicate any reasons why the acquisition would not be subject to jurisdiction under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, requiring individuals to refer to the petition for full details.

  • • The document assumes familiarity with terms like 'gathering function' and 'jurisdiction under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act', which may not be clear to all readers without additional context.

  • • This document lacks an abstract which could provide a clearer overview of the document's content and purpose, facilitating easier comprehension for readers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 634
Sentences: 21
Entities: 68

Language

Nouns: 213
Verbs: 53
Adjectives: 27
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 34

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.88
Average Sentence Length:
30.19
Token Entropy:
5.13
Readability (ARI):
20.33

Reading Time

about 2 minutes