Overview
Title
Revision of Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: TSA Claims Application
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The TSA wants people to give more information when they say something got lost, broken, or someone got hurt because of TSA workers at airports. They want to make sure they can sort these problems out better and ask everyone to share their thoughts on this new plan until January 15, 2025.
Summary AI
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is revising its process for collecting information from individuals who file claims against the agency. The TSA seeks to gather additional documentation to resolve claims related to property loss, personal injury, or other damages allegedly caused by TSA employees. The public is invited to comment on this revised information collection until January 15, 2025. The TSA expects around 7,500 respondents yearly, with a total annual burden of 3,900 hours.
Abstract
This notice announces that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has forwarded the Information Collection Request (ICR), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number 1652-0039, abstracted below to OMB for review and approval of an revision of the currently approved collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. The collection involves the submission of additional information from claimants in order to thoroughly examine and resolve tort claims against the agency.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The document under review is a notice from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), part of the Department of Homeland Security. It describes a revision to the TSA's process for collecting information from individuals who file claims against the agency, notably under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This revised process aims to gather more comprehensive data to resolve claims related to property loss, personal injury, or other damages that allegedly result from actions by TSA employees.
General Summary
The TSA is addressing the need to update its Information Collection Request. This change will allow it to collect more detailed information from claimants who seek compensation for damages under federal tort claims. The revised process involves the addition of a Supplemental Information Form and the Authorization for Disclosure of Protected Health Information, which allows the agency to request information covered by HIPAA if necessary to adjudicate claims.
Significant Issues and Concerns
While the TSA aims to streamline and improve its claims process, several concerns arise from the document:
Lack of Specificity: The document lacks clarity regarding what specific additional information is required from claimants. This vagueness may pose challenges for those filing claims, as they might be unclear about what documentation or details are necessary, potentially leading to inconsistent submissions.
Privacy and Security Issues: Introducing the requirement for TSA Form 600, which involves collecting sensitive personal information protected under HIPAA, raises critical privacy and security issues. The document does not explain how the information will be stored, accessed, or otherwise protected, which could be a concern for claimants.
Discrepancy in Respondent Numbers: There appears to be a mismatch between the estimated number of claimants—7,500 annually—and the document's mention of approximately 750 tort claims each month, which would suggest 9,000 claims annually. This discrepancy requires clarification to understand the expected workload and its implications on the claims process.
Complex Language: The language used in the "Comments Invited" section of the document includes legal references and technical jargon that the general public might find challenging to understand without additional context or explanation.
Broad Public Impact
For the general public, this revision may lead to a more efficient claims process, ideally resolving disputes more swiftly and transparently. However, the requirement for additional information, particularly sensitive health information, may deter some individuals from filing claims due to privacy concerns. The complexity and lack of clarity in the document could also affect individuals' understanding of their rights and the claims process itself.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Claimants: Individuals seeking redress for potential damages caused by TSA actions may find the revised process beneficial if it results in expedited claims handling. However, they might also face increased administrative burden due to the additional documentation requirements, and they could have concerns about their personal information's security.
TSA and Administrative Staff: The agency may benefit from improved data accuracy and completeness, facilitating better decision-making in claim adjudications. However, staff will need to manage the heightened responsibility of handling sensitive information and ensuring compliance with privacy standards.
Legal and Privacy Advocates: These stakeholders might scrutinize the TSA's handling of claims, especially regarding data collection and privacy protections. Their focus could help drive further refinements to ensure that both efficiency and privacy are adequately balanced in the claims process.
In summary, while the TSA's attempt to enhance its information collection process could streamline handling tort claims, clarifying and addressing the current issues identified in the document will be crucial for ensuring that claimants and the agency can benefit from these changes without undue burden or risk.
Issues
• The document lacks clarity about the specific additional information required from claimants for resolving tort claims, potentially leading to confusion or inconsistent submissions.
• The document mentions the need for TSA Form 600 and information protected by HIPAA without detailing how the privacy and security of this sensitive information will be ensured and managed.
• The estimated number of respondents and the estimated annual burden hours seem disproportionately low compared to the mention of 'approximately 750 tort claims per month,' as this would imply 9,000 claims annually. This discrepancy should be clarified.
• The document does not specify the types of tort claims or provide examples other than mentioning 'airport screening activities, motor vehicle accidents, and employee loss,' which might leave respondents guessing about other eligible incidents.
• The language used in the 'Comments Invited' section is somewhat complex, with legal references that might be difficult for the general public to fully understand without further explanation or simplification.