FR 2024-29561

The document from the Federal Register announces a closed meeting of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) scheduled for December 18, 2024. This meeting is set to occur at 10:00 a.m. in Bethesda, Maryland. It is noted as a "Closed Commission Meeting," and the agenda includes a "briefing matter," although specific details about this matter are not disclosed. The contact for more information is Alberta E. Mills, the Commission Secretary.

General Summary

The Consumer Product Safety Commission, an agency focused on protecting the public from potential hazards associated with consumer products, is holding a closed meeting. Scheduled for December 18, 2024, this meeting is not open to the public. The primary item put forth for discussion is referred to as a "briefing matter," though further elaboration on the topic is absent. The document specifies the date, time, and location, along with contact details for any inquiries.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One major issue with this notice is the lack of transparency. The nature of the "briefing matter" that will be considered during the meeting is not specified, which might leave the public and other stakeholders guessing about the topics under discussion. Additionally, the mention of the session as a "Closed Commission Meeting" without any justification can create a perception of secrecy. Such meetings, by nature, may be necessary for handling confidential matters, but not providing details can lead to a sense of exclusion among those it potentially affects.

Another point of concern is the absence of an abstract in the metadata section of the document. An abstract could serve as a helpful overview or context for the meeting's purpose, thereby improving understanding and accessibility for the public and stakeholders.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, particularly those interested in consumer safety, this lack of information can be frustrating. Transparency is essential in fostering trust in government agencies like the CPSC, which are responsible for overseeing consumer safety regulations. The closed nature of the meeting might leave the public unsure about whether it concerns critical issues affecting consumer products they use daily.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, such as manufacturers, consumer advocacy groups, and legal professionals, could view the closed meeting with suspicion or concern. Manufacturers may worry about potential regulatory changes impacting their operations. Similarly, consumer advocacy groups might be troubled by the lack of public insight into discussions that could shift consumer safety standards or policies. Alternatively, the closed meeting could be positive for stakeholders if it is intended to discuss sensitive information that relates to compliance and safety measures.

In conclusion, while the CPSC has likely sound reasons for closing this meeting and keeping specifics under wraps, addressing transparency and inclusivity concerns could better align with public expectations and improve engagement and trust among all interested parties.