FR 2024-29548

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Application for Grants Under the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) and Fostering Undergraduate Talent by Unlocking Resources for Education (FUTURE) Act 2019 Programs (1894-0001)

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Education wants to keep collecting data to help certain colleges for a little while longer, just like they have been doing, but they need people to tell them if this is still a good idea.

Summary AI

The Department of Education's Office of Postsecondary Education announced a notice concerning an information collection request under the Paperwork Reduction Act. They are seeking to extend, without change, the current data collection related to grants for the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) and FUTURE Act 2019 Programs. The purpose of this data collection is to support these programs in providing resources to enhance the infrastructure and academic capabilities of historically Black institutions. Public comments can be submitted until January 15, 2025, and the information will be used to process new and continuing awards efficiently.

Abstract

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the Department is proposing an extension without change of a currently approved information collection request (ICR).

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 101588
Document #: 2024-29548
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 101588-101589

AnalysisAI

The Federal Register document from the Office of Postsecondary Education within the Department of Education serves as a notice regarding a specific information collection request (ICR). This request is focused on the application process for grants under the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) and Fostering Undergraduate Talent by Unlocking Resources for Education (FUTURE) Act 2019 Programs. These programs are designed to provide resources to historically Black institutions to enhance their infrastructure and academic capabilities. The notice indicates the Department's intention to extend the currently approved data collection without changes, and it invites public comment until January 15, 2025.

Summary of the Document

The document announces the Department of Education's intention to extend an existing ICR related to HBCU and FUTURE Act 2019 Programs without any changes. The main aim of this collection is to support historically Black institutions by collecting data necessary for processing new and ongoing grant awards. It highlights the Department's ongoing commitment to supporting these educational institutions, all while adhering to the guidelines set out by the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Significant Issues or Concerns

Several crucial issues arise from this notice. Firstly, the document does not detailedly explain the criteria or metrics used to evaluate the necessity and efficiency of the information collection. Such details might be essential to alleviate public concerns regarding the effectiveness and timeliness of the processes involved.

Secondly, the estimated annual burden of 3,668 hours posed on respondents seems substantial. A clearer explanation of how this figure was calculated and justified could potentially address questions of feasibility and fairness.

Additionally, there is a lack of specifics on how the Department plans to improve the quality, utility, and clarity of collected information. Without this information, it might be challenging for stakeholders to understand how their data will be used to benefit them effectively.

Moreover, there is no mention of safeguards or strategies in place to ensure that data collection is conducted in a manner that minimizes burden on respondents, especially through the use of information technology. Ensuring respondent ease and minimizing their workload is vital for an efficient data collection process.

Finally, the reasoning behind seeking an extension without modifications is unclear. This absence of explanation might lead to further questions about whether there are missed opportunities for refinement or modernization in the collection processes.

Impact on the Public

The public, particularly those associated with historically Black colleges and universities, may be affected by this notice in several ways. Broadly, this document has the potential to positively impact higher education at these institutions by facilitating the continuation of grant support, which is crucial for infrastructure and academic enhancements.

However, the lack of detailed information on how public input can influence the process and the burden on respondents might lead to concerns. Individuals involved in supplying the required information may feel overwhelmed by the workload without comprehensive communication from the Department.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The primary stakeholders here are the historically Black colleges and universities and the individuals involved in the grant application process. For these educational institutions, the notice may provide continued financial support necessary for sustaining growth. They stand to benefit from the resources allocated through these grants, aiding in maintaining or expanding their academic offerings and facilities.

Conversely, stakeholders required to participate in the data collection process may face challenges if the burden remains high and if improvements in data handling and process efficiency are not sufficiently implemented. Engaging with these stakeholders to reduce the burden and increase data collection efficiency through technological means could potentially improve receptivity and cooperation.

In conclusion, while the notice represents the Department of Education's efforts to maintain crucial support for historically Black educational institutions, there are vital concerns and questions that need addressing to engage stakeholders effectively and minimize their burdens.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the specific criteria or metrics used to evaluate the necessity and efficiency of the information collection, which could be helpful in addressing public concerns about proper functionality and processing timeliness.

  • • The estimated burden of 3,668 annual hours could be seen as significant without detailed justification or explanation of how this estimate was derived.

  • • The language does not specify how the Department plans to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected, leaving room for ambiguity in implementation strategies.

  • • The document lacks details on safeguards to ensure that the process of data collection minimally burdens respondents, particularly with the use of information technology.

  • • There is no explanation of why an extension without change is being requested, which might lead to questions about the need for updates or revisions in the information collection processes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 692
Sentences: 28
Entities: 57

Language

Nouns: 226
Verbs: 54
Adjectives: 30
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 35

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.23
Average Sentence Length:
24.71
Token Entropy:
5.16
Readability (ARI):
18.87

Reading Time

about 2 minutes