FR 2024-29513

Overview

Title

New Postal Products

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Postal people want to change how they mail packages with a new agreement, and they want to know what everyone thinks about it. You can tell them your thoughts by December 17, 2024, just by going to their website and writing your comments.

Summary AI

The Postal Regulatory Commission has announced a recent filing by the Postal Service. This filing involves a negotiated service agreement that the Commission is considering. The public is invited to comment on the filing by December 17, 2024. Details about the filing can be accessed on the Commission's website, and instructions are provided for submitting comments electronically.

Abstract

The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing for the Commission's consideration concerning a negotiated service agreement. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 101647
Document #: 2024-29513
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 101647-101650

AnalysisAI

General Summary

The document is a notice from the Postal Regulatory Commission, which has been published in the Federal Register. It outlines a series of recent filings by the United States Postal Service (USPS) involving negotiated service agreements. These agreements pertain to various postal services, predominantly under the competitive product list such as Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS Ground Advantage contracts. The document serves primarily to inform the public about these filings, provide details about the proceedings related to each filing, and invite public comment by a specified date.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several issues may arise concerning the document as it presents a complex and dense array of information. Notably, the document lists numerous docket numbers and filings, each associated with specific products and agreements. This extensive information could be overwhelming for those unfamiliar with the legal or regulatory processes involved in postal services. Additionally, the document frequently references sections of U.S. Code and the Code of Federal Regulations, which could be confusing for readers who lack legal expertise.

The repetitive and structured layout, especially in the "Public Proceeding(s)" section, might also lead to confusion, making it difficult for a reader to focus on each specific docket or filing. Although the notice invites public comments, there is little guidance on how the public can effectively contribute their opinions on these service agreements, possibly discouraging participation.

The document mentions that certain portions of the USPS requests are non-public, yet it does not elaborate on what specific types of information are withheld. This might lead to concerns about transparency among the public, as well as questions about what details are deemed confidential and why.

Impact on the Public

The document, while technical and regulatory in nature, has potential implications for the general public, particularly in how postal services are priced and delivered. Negotiated service agreements are often designed to create efficiencies and tailor services to the needs of specific customers or service routes, potentially influencing the cost and availability of postal services.

For the broader public, these agreements could mean adjustments in the service levels or pricing structures for mail delivery, depending on the outcome of these agreements and any changes approved by the Commission. The public's ability to comment on these agreements is an opportunity for civic engagement, although the lack of clear guidance on how to submit effective comments could limit participation from a wider audience.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders, like businesses and large-volume mail customers, may be positively affected by these negotiations, as they often result in cost savings and more customized service arrangements. These stakeholders typically engage in negotiations to achieve efficient bulk mailing solutions which can benefit their overall operations.

On the other hand, smaller businesses or individual customers might view these negotiations less favorably if they perceive them as potentially leading to higher costs or reduced service levels for regular postal services. The secrecy surrounding the non-public portions of the agreements could also raise concerns among stakeholders about fairness and equity in how these agreements are crafted and implemented.

Overall, while the document serves a necessary function in regulatory compliance and public transparency, its complexity and technicality challenge the broad understanding and engagement by the general public.

Issues

  • • The document contains a large number of docket numbers and filings, which might be difficult and time-consuming to review individually for those unfamiliar with the process.

  • • The language used in the document includes numerous references to U.S. Code (e.g., '39 U.S.C. 3642') and Code of Federal Regulations (e.g., '39 CFR 3035.105'), which may not be easily understood by the general public without legal knowledge.

  • • The recurring format and structure of the document sections, particularly under 'Public Proceeding(s)', can be repetitive, potentially leading to confusion or oversight of specific details.

  • • The notice invites public comments but does not provide clear guidance or examples on how to effectively comment on the service agreements, which could discourage participation from non-experts.

  • • While the notice states that certain portions of requests are non-public, it does not elaborate on the type of information that is withheld, which might leave the public questioning transparency.

  • • The scope of the document regarding the number of contracts and their specifications (e.g., specific terms and conditions) is not fully detailed, requiring users to perform additional steps to access this information via specific dockets.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 4
Words: 4,709
Sentences: 191
Entities: 577

Language

Nouns: 1,834
Verbs: 130
Adjectives: 89
Adverbs: 5
Numbers: 577

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.17
Average Sentence Length:
24.65
Token Entropy:
4.46
Readability (ARI):
23.01

Reading Time

about 18 minutes