Overview
Title
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Advance Notification Form: Tourist and Other Non-Governmental Activities in the Antarctic Treaty Area
Agencies
ELI5 AI
The State Department wants people to tell them what they think about a plan to get important information from tourists visiting Antarctica. They need help figuring out if collecting this information is helpful and how to make the process easier.
Summary AI
The Department of State is seeking public comments on a proposed collection of information related to tourist and other non-governmental activities in Antarctica. This collection, called the Advance Notification Form (DS-4131), helps the U.S. government comply with international agreements regarding activities in the Antarctic region. People have until January 13, 2025, to send in their comments. The comments aim to help evaluate the necessity and efficiency of this information collection and improve the process and requirements.
Abstract
The Department of State has submitted the information collection described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are requesting comments on this collection from all interested individuals and organizations. The purpose of this Notice is to allow 30 days for public comment.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
The Department of State has issued a notice requesting public comments on a proposed information collection process concerning tourist and other non-governmental activities in Antarctica. This collection, known as the Advance Notification Form (DS-4131), is vital for the U.S. to adhere to international commitments set forth in the Antarctic Treaty. The public has until January 13, 2025, to submit their feedback. This process not only allows the Department to ascertain the necessity and accuracy of the data collection but also seeks to enhance the quality and reduce the burden on respondents through possible improvements in methodology.
The initiative attempts to gather feedback on several fronts: whether this form is essential, if the estimated time and cost burdens are accurate, how the quality of information collected can be improved, and how burden on respondents can be minimized. This solicitation of public opinion underscores the Department's commitment to transparency and collaboration with stakeholders in refining its procedures and ensuring compliance with international Antarctic guidelines.
Significant Issues and Concerns
There are several noteworthy issues and areas where the document could benefit from additional clarity:
Criteria for Necessity: The notice does not specify the criteria or methods that will be used to evaluate if this information collection is indeed necessary for the Department's operations. This lack of detail could lead to ambiguity for stakeholders trying to understand the collection's importance and relevance.
Selection of Respondents: The document estimates that there will be 25 respondents, but it does not explain how these respondents are selected. This lack of information might raise questions about whether the sample of respondents is representative of the broader population of Americans organizing Antarctic expeditions.
Data Security: While the form is submitted via email, the document does not discuss measures to secure sensitive information included in these submissions. This omission could be a point of concern for organizations worried about data protection.
Consequences of Non-Compliance: The notice does not provide insight into any consequences for operators who fail to submit the form. Understanding these implications is crucial for respondents to understand the mandatory nature of this collection.
Estimated Response Burden: The document estimates that each response will require nine hours to complete but does not breakdown this time or justify the estimate. This could obscure stakeholders' ability to assess the true burden of the reporting requirements.
Impact on the Public and Specific Stakeholders
For the general public, especially those with direct or indirect ties to Antarctic expeditions, this document highlights the American government's dedication to fulfilling its international obligations. By participating in the public comment phase, individuals and organizations can influence how information is gathered and ensure that procedures are not overly burdensome or inefficient.
For specific stakeholders, particularly organizers of Antarctic expeditions from the United States, this notice indicates a formal obligation to provide specific details about their trips. While this could include time and resource commitments to comply with the data collection process, it also offers these stakeholders an opportunity to voice any difficulties or propose enhancements to the current mechanism. Those who engage in this process could directly influence the refinement of this mandatory procedure for increased utility and decreased hassle. However, without concrete details on data protection and compliance consequences, these operators may feel uncertainty about the responsibilities and risks surrounding the notification form submission.
Issues
• The document does not specify the specific criteria or methods used to evaluate whether the proposed information collection is necessary, which could lead to ambiguity in understanding its importance.
• There is no detailed explanation of why there are only 25 estimated respondents and how these respondents are selected, which could raise questions about representativeness.
• The methodology section mentions the submission of the form via email but does not specify the security measures in place to protect sensitive information provided in such communications.
• The document does not provide clarity on the consequences of non-compliance for operators who do not submit the form, which could be important for respondents to understand the obligation to respond.
• The average time per response is estimated at 9 hours, which may seem extensive, but there is no breakdown or justification of tasks contributing to this time estimate, potentially obscuring the assessment of the reporting burden.