Overview
Title
Michelin North America, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Agencies
ELI5 AI
Michelin made some spare tires that have the wrong air pressure number written on them, but they say the tires are still safe. They're asking car safety people to agree that it's not a big deal.
Summary AI
Michelin North America found that certain spare tires labeled Michelin TEX T195/65R22 do not fully meet the standards required by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 109 because they were marked with incorrect inflation pressures. The company reported this issue in May 2024 and requested that the noncompliance be considered minor and not affecting motor vehicle safety. The tires incorrectly show an inflation pressure of 350 kPa instead of the correct 420 kPa in one of the marked locations. Despite this mistake, Michelin argues that the tires are safe at both pressures and has taken steps to fix the issue on new tires. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is reviewing this petition but has not made any decision yet.
Abstract
Michelin North America, Inc. (MNA) has determined that certain Michelin TEX T195/65R22 T-type spare tires do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 109, New Pneumatic Tires for Vehicles Manufactured from 1949 To 1975, Bias Ply Tires, and T-Type Spare Tires. MNA filed a noncompliance report dated May 1, 2024, and subsequently petitioned NHTSA (the "Agency") on May 29, 2024, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This document announces receipt of MNA's petition.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
General Summary
The document in question is a notice from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) about a petition received from Michelin North America, Inc. (MNA). The petition addresses a noncompliance issue concerning certain Michelin TEX T195/65R22 T-type spare tires. These tires, manufactured between September 2023 and March 2024, were marked with an incorrect inflation pressure value, which does not comply with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) No. 109. MNA has requested NHTSA to consider this noncompliance as minor, arguing that it does not impact motor vehicle safety.
Significant Issues and Concerns
One significant issue is the complexity of the document due to the repeated legal references and regulatory language, which might be difficult for a general audience to follow. The document also assumes a certain level of prior knowledge about specific legal provisions, which can make the content less accessible to those unfamiliar with U.S. regulatory processes.
Another concern is that the document does not clearly explain why NHTSA has not yet made a decision on the petition. This lack of information may leave readers uncertain about the status of the request. Additionally, while MNA assures that the incorrect labeling does not compromise safety, there is a noticeable absence of technical justification explaining why the incorrect tire pressure marking is inconsequential.
Impact on the Public
The notice invites public comment, which demonstrates a level of transparency in the decision-making process and encourages community engagement. This participation could influence how such noncompliance issues are viewed and handled in the future. However, given the technical nature of the document, individuals unfamiliar with regulatory compliance may find it challenging to engage meaningfully with the content.
Impact on Stakeholders
For Michelin, the outcome of this petition could significantly impact its reputation and operations. If NHTSA grants the petition, it could avoid the costs associated with notifying owners and rectifying the mistake. For distributors and dealers, the document indicates that they cannot sell or distribute the noncompliant tires but doesn't provide further guidance, which might lead to operational uncertainties.
On the consumer side, while MNA assures safety compliance at both pressures, the presence of two conflicting inflation instructions could lead to confusion, and potentially improper use, unless adequately addressed. It's imperative for consumers to verify the correct tire pressure for their safety.
Overall, while the document outlines Michelin's petition and related procedures clearly, it might benefit from additional clarifications for the general public and specific guidance for stakeholders involved.
Issues
• The document does not explicitly state the reasons why NHTSA has not yet made a decision regarding MNA's petition, which could leave readers uncertain about the status of the request.
• The repetition of legal references and documentation numbers in the text could be seen as overly complex and may be difficult for readers not familiar with such references to understand.
• The section on how to submit comments is long and detailed, which might be overwhelming or confusing for individuals who are not accustomed to dealing with regulatory submissions.
• There is no rationale provided for why the discrepancy between the tire pressures would not impact safety, aside from MNA's assurance; this could be seen as needing further technical justification for the non-expert audience.
• The document mentions that the petition does not provide relief for distributors and dealers regarding noncompliant tires already under their control without providing guidance on what actions they should take, which might lead to confusion.
• The language used in describing the noncompliance is technical, using terminology such as 'maximum permissible inflation pressures' and 'FMVSS No. 109 performance testing,' which may not be easily understood by a layperson.
• The document assumes prior knowledge about specific legal provisions and standards, making it less accessible to readers unfamiliar with U.S. Code or Federal Regulation stipulations.
• No specific impact assessment is provided regarding how the error could potentially affect consumers negatively or positively, focusing primarily on legal and compliance aspects.