FR 2024-29415

Overview

Title

Certification, Compliance, and Enforcement for Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Energy fixed a mistake in a rule by making sure that numbers are rounded properly to two decimal places, so everything is clear and easy to understand.

Summary AI

The Department of Energy is publishing a correction to an error found in the Code of Federal Regulations. This correction is in Title 10, specifically section 429.69, which involves reinstating the sentence: “Represented values must be rounded to the nearest hundredth.” The correction ensures the text reflects the most accurate and updated regulation requirements. This change is intended to maintain clarity and precision in the regulatory text.

Type: Rule
Citation: 89 FR 100302
Document #: 2024-29415
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 100302-100302

AnalysisAI

In this document from the Federal Register, the Department of Energy addresses a specific correction to the Code of Federal Regulations, specifically in Title 10, section 429.69. The correction involves reinstating the sentence: "Represented values must be rounded to the nearest hundredth." The notice aims to rectify an error from the most recent annual revision of the regulations, ensuring the text remains precise and clear.

General Summary of the Document

The document is primarily a correction, often viewed as an editorial or technical amendment rather than a new or substantive rule. By realigning the regulatory text to include the necessary rounding instructions, the document ensures that those using the regulations have the correct and intended information. This type of correction, while seemingly minor, is essential for maintaining the integrity of the regulatory framework.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One of the notable issues with the document is its classification as a "Rule" in the metadata. Since it corrects an editorial error, it might be more accurately described as a "Correction" or a "Technical Amendment." Such a distinction is important for transparency and understanding the document's intent and weight. Moreover, there is limited context provided regarding the initial error's impact or significance, which makes it challenging to gauge its importance. Insight into how the error occurred could help in preventing similar mistakes in the future.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, such a correction might seem minor and technical. However, accurate regulatory texts are crucial for businesses, especially those involved in consumer products and commercial and industrial equipment. The rounding of values has the potential to affect compliance calculations, pricing, and reporting, ensuring that companies follow consistent standards. Therefore, this correction can help prevent misunderstandings or compliance issues that arise from unclear regulations.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Businesses and manufacturers dealing with energy-related products are likely the most affected stakeholders. The reinstatement of rounding requires them to adjust their calculations and reporting to match the corrected standard, which can lead to administrative adjustments but also provides clarity and consistency. This correction may positively impact those who experienced confusion due to the earlier oversight. Compliance officers and legal teams within these organizations must be diligent in incorporating such changes to maintain adherence to federal standards.

In summary, while the correction appears minor, it highlights the importance of maintaining accuracy in regulatory texts. Proper classification and transparency of such documents ensure clarity and help build trust among businesses and the public in the rules governing such important sectors.

Issues

  • • The document is labeled as a 'Rule,' but it appears to primarily address a correction to the Code of Federal Regulations, which might be considered a 'Correction' or 'Technical Amendment' rather than a substantive rule.

  • • The rule provides limited context regarding the impact or significance of the correction, making it difficult to assess its importance or implications.

  • • The document does not provide information about how the error occurred in the first place, which could be useful for understanding the necessity of the correction.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 116
Sentences: 3
Entities: 13

Language

Nouns: 30
Verbs: 8
Adjectives: 5
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 14

Complexity

Average Token Length:
3.77
Average Sentence Length:
38.67
Token Entropy:
4.14
Readability (ARI):
18.90

Reading Time

less than a minute