Overview
Title
Request for Comment on the National Cyber Incident Response Plan Update
Agencies
ELI5 AI
CISA, a government agency, is asking everyone who knows about computers and internet safety to help make a plan better by telling them what could be improved. They want this help before January 15, 2025, but it's like trying to finish homework really fast!
Summary AI
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), part of the Department of Homeland Security, has issued a draft update of the National Cyber Incident Response Plan (NCIRP) and is seeking public feedback. CISA encourages cybersecurity and incident response experts from the public and private sectors to review and comment on the draft by January 15, 2025. This update aims to improve coordination among federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial governments, as well as the private sector, to better handle significant cyber incidents. The draft is available for review online at CISA's website and the federal regulations portal.
Abstract
CISA has released a draft of the National Cyber Incident Response Plan (NCIRP) Update for public comment. CISA invites cybersecurity and incident response stakeholders from across public and private sectors or other interested parties to review the draft update document and provide comments, relevant information, and feedback.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
In December 2024, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), part of the Department of Homeland Security, released a draft update of the National Cyber Incident Response Plan (NCIRP). This plan is critical for effectively managing and mitigating significant cyber incidents that affect the United States. Recognizing the fast-evolving landscape of cyber threats, CISA has called for public and private sector stakeholders to provide feedback on the draft update by January 15, 2025. This feedback period aims to gather a wide range of insights to bolster coordination between federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government entities, as well as private sector partners.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several notable concerns emerge from the document. Firstly, the draft update does not disclose financial implications, making it challenging to evaluate potential costs or instances of wasteful spending. Additionally, there is a lack of transparency regarding which specific organizations or individuals might benefit most or be disproportionately impacted by the changes, leading to potential concerns about favoritism or inequity. Furthermore, the document does not explain how stakeholders' feedback will be integrated into the final plan, which could lead to uncertainties about whether this input truly influences the final outcome.
The document's use of technical language may present comprehension barriers for the general public, potentially limiting widespread engagement. Moreover, with a feedback window of roughly one month, some organizations might find the timeline too restrictive to conduct detailed reviews and provide comprehensive responses. Finally, CISA’s notice lacks clear guidelines on submitting confidential or sensitive information, which may discourage open dialogue due to concerns about privacy given that all comments will be made public.
Impact on the Public
The update to the NCIRP holds significant potential for public impact, as it proposes enhancements to national strategies for dealing with cyber threats that could affect critical infrastructure and services. Improved coordination and response strategies could lead to more robust protections for public utilities and government services, enhancing national resilience against cyber-attacks. However, the complexity and technical nature of the document might limit broader public understanding and engagement, potentially reducing public oversight or interest in the process.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
For cybersecurity professionals and entities within both the public and private sectors, this updated draft provides a crucial opportunity to influence national cybersecurity policy. Clear guidance and effective coordination strategies could benefit all stakeholders by reducing the risk and impact of cyber incidents. However, the short timeline for feedback might pose challenges, particularly for smaller organizations with limited resources, limiting their ability to contribute meaningfully to the input process. On the other hand, large corporations with dedicated cybersecurity divisions might more easily leverage this opportunity to shape policies favorable to their operational needs and priorities.
In summary, while the initiative to update the NCIRP represents a proactive step towards enhancing national cybersecurity, it is accompanied by several concerns regarding transparency, participation, and comprehensibility. Addressing these issues could lead to a more inclusive and effective national cybersecurity strategy.
Issues
• The notice does not mention any specific budget or cost associated with the update of the National Cyber Incident Response Plan (NCIRP). Without financial details, it is difficult to assess potential wasteful spending.
• There is no mention of any specific organizations, groups, or individuals that might benefit disproportionately from the NCIRP update. More transparency regarding stakeholders and potential beneficiaries could be needed.
• The process of how feedback from stakeholders will be specifically incorporated into the final NCIRP update is not detailed, which could lead to ambiguity about stakeholder influence.
• The document uses technical language (e.g., "joint cyber planning authorities," "Presidential Policy Directive 41," "6 U.S.C. 665b") which may be difficult for the general public to understand.
• The terms on the incorporation of feedback and lessons learned from stakeholders are not explicitly defined, creating potential ambiguity on how inclusive and comprehensive the updates will be for all relevant non-federal stakeholders.
• The timeline for comment submission is relatively short (approximately one month), which could limit the ability of some stakeholders to provide detailed feedback.
• The notice does not clearly define how it will manage or restrict the submission of confidential or sensitive information, considering that all comments will be made public.