FR 2024-29309

Overview

Title

Notice of Availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact for the Interstate 15 South Cedar Interchange in Utah and Final Federal Agency Actions

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government has decided to make changes to a road in Utah to make it safer and faster, and they've checked to make sure these changes won't hurt the environment.

Summary AI

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) have announced the availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for a project on Interstate 15 in Cedar City, Utah. This project aims to improve the I-15 South Cedar Interchange and surrounding roads to enhance safety, mobility, and active transportation connectivity. UDOT has completed the necessary environmental evaluations and has issued permits and approvals required by federal law for this project. The final agency actions were made available on December 4, 2024, and any legal claims against these actions must be filed by May 12, 2025.

Abstract

The FHWA, on behalf of UDOT, is issuing this notice to announce the availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Interstate 15 South Cedar Interchange in Cedar City, Iron County, Utah. In addition, this notice is being issued to announce actions taken by UDOT that are final Federal agency actions related to the project referenced above. Those actions grant licenses, permits and/or approvals for the project. The Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) provides details on the Selected Alternative for the proposed improvements.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 101091
Document #: 2024-29309
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 101091-101092

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register, issued by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), announces the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for a project concerning the Interstate 15 South Cedar Interchange in Cedar City, Utah. This project is designed to enhance traffic mobility, safety, and connectivity for vehicles and pedestrians in the area.

General Overview

The announcement highlights that UDOT, acting on behalf of FHWA, has completed necessary evaluations and issued the required permits and approvals in compliance with federal law. These evaluations determined that the project's impact would not be significant enough to warrant further environmental scrutiny, hence the issuance of the FONSI. The document indicates final agency actions were made on December 4, 2024, and specifies a deadline of May 12, 2025, for any legal challenges to be filed regarding these actions.

Significant Issues and Concerns

A few issues arise from the document's content:

  1. Lack of Detailed Explanation: The term "Single Point Urban Interchange," used to describe the Selected Alternative for the project, is not explained in detail. For those unfamiliar with transportation planning jargon, this could lead to confusion about the project's specifics.

  2. Abbreviations and Legal References: The document repeatedly uses the abbreviation "FONSI" without an initial explanation, which might confuse readers not familiar with environmental assessment processes. Additionally, references to numerous laws and executive orders are made without providing summaries, making it challenging for the general public to fully grasp the legal context.

  3. Judicial Review Deadline: The document specifies a deadline for filing claims for judicial review but does not elaborate on the implications of failing to meet this deadline, potentially leading to misunderstandings for those affected or interested in contesting the project's decisions.

  4. Public Access to Information: While contact information is provided for Carissa Watanabe, the document does not clarify the nature of inquiries that should be addressed to her, leading to possible confusion about how the public can provide input or express concerns. Furthermore, although a website link is given for accessing the Environmental Assessment (EA) and FONSI documents, instructions on navigating or downloading these documents are sparse.

Impact on the Public

For the public, this project promises benefits like improved road safety and better traffic flow, which can significantly enhance daily commutes and transportation logistics in Cedar City. The improvements may also bolster the local economy by facilitating smoother transportation routes for goods and services.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Local Residents and Commuters: Residents and regular commuters in Cedar City stand to benefit from reduced traffic congestion and improved road conditions, which can lead to shorter travel times and enhanced road safety.

Environmental and Community Advocates: Groups focused on environmental protection might be concerned with the document's assurances regarding minimal environmental impact. Such advocates typically scrutinize whether projects like these genuinely meet stringent environmental guidelines.

Legal and Planning Entities: Attorneys and policymakers may have interest in the document both in terms of its legal implications and its role in setting precedents for future infrastructure projects involving federal and state collaboration.

Overall, while the Interstate 15 South Cedar Interchange project promises infrastructural improvement and safety enhancements, clarity in communication and accessibility of information remain vital. Addressing these concerns would ensure that all stakeholders, from the general public to specific interest groups, have a clear understanding of the project's scope and implications.

Issues

  • • The document's description of the Selected Alternative as the 'Single Point Urban Interchange' is not explained in detail, which may be unclear to those unfamiliar with transportation planning.

  • • The document references numerous laws and executive orders without providing summaries or explanations, which could be difficult for the general public to understand.

  • • The term 'FONSI' is used repeatedly without a clear initial explanation of what it stands for, potentially confusing readers unfamiliar with this abbreviation.

  • • The deadline for filing a claim for judicial review is mentioned, but the consequences of missing this deadline are not clearly outlined, which could lead to potential misunderstandings.

  • • Contact information is provided for Carissa Watanabe, but it might not be clear what specific inquiries should be directed to her, leading to uncertainty about the appropriate channel for public input or concerns.

  • • The availability of the EA and FONSI documents is stated, but the process for obtaining or reviewing them is not detailed beyond a general website link, which might limit public access.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,472
Sentences: 62
Entities: 213

Language

Nouns: 563
Verbs: 68
Adjectives: 44
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 161

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.61
Average Sentence Length:
23.74
Token Entropy:
5.44
Readability (ARI):
15.59

Reading Time

about 5 minutes