FR 2024-29300

Overview

Title

Tests Determined To Be Suitable for Use in the National Reporting System for Adult Education

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government says a special reading test for adults can keep being used until June 30, 2025, even though it was supposed to stop earlier. If people find big mistakes or changes in the test, the permission to use it can be taken away.

Summary AI

The Department of Education has announced that a specific test approved for the National Reporting System for Adult Education, which would have expired on February 5, 2025, can continue to be used until June 30, 2025. This applies to the Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS) Reading GOALS Series for literacy and English language arts. The notice specifies that only the approved forms and computer-based formats can be used. If the Secretary finds inaccurate information about a test or if a test is significantly changed, the approval can be revoked following specific procedures.

Abstract

The Secretary announces that a test with National Reporting System for Adult Education (NRS) approval expiring on February 5, 2025, may continue to be used by States and local eligible providers during a sunset period ending on June 30, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 100472
Document #: 2024-29300
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 100472-100473

AnalysisAI

The document from the Department of Education announces an extension for the use of a specific test in the National Reporting System for Adult Education (NRS). Originally, the approval for this test was set to expire on February 5, 2025, but the approval has been extended to June 30, 2025. This extension applies to the Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS) Reading GOALS Series, which is used to assess literacy and English language arts.

General Summary

The primary purpose of the notice is to inform states and local education providers about the continuation of using the CASAS Reading GOALS Series during the extended approval period. The document highlights that only specific test forms and their computer-delivery formats are approved for measuring educational gains within the NRS framework. It also details the possibility of revoking approval if incorrect information was submitted or if a test undergoes substantial changes.

Significant Issues or Concerns

A significant concern raised by the document is the lack of explanation for implementing a sunset period—the time frame during which the test remains usable post the original expiration date. This absence of rationale may leave educational stakeholders unsure about the strategic planning or intended outcomes behind the extension decision, potentially leading to uncertainty in program operations.

Moreover, there is no discussion regarding the potential financial impacts of continuing the use of this test. Information on costs related with the development, acquisition, or usage of these assessments would be beneficial. Without such details, stakeholders may question the economical efficiency of this decision, especially if there are concerns about redundant expenditures.

Additionally, the document is vague about the criteria or processes for approving or revoking a test's suitability. Clearly defining these processes could instill a sense of trust and transparency for stakeholders in the test evaluation process. The scattered information about acquiring accessible document formats further fragments the potentially useful resources for individuals requiring alternative formats, adding a layer of inconvenience.

Potential Impact on the Public

Broadly, the public, particularly those involved with adult education programs, may experience both reassurance and concern. The reassurance stems from the continuity in assessments during this period, a factor critical in maintaining program consistency and educational data accuracy. Conversely, the lack of clear reasoning for the sunset period could raise concerns about the stability and predictability of educational planning efforts.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Educators and Administrators: For those directly involved in administering these tests, the extension may offer continuity and allow for ongoing educational assessments without abrupt changes. However, the ambiguity regarding potential revocation of tests could create operational uncertainties.

Test Publishers: There exists a risk for test publishers if unclear revocation processes impair their ability to prepare or adapt, potentially affecting their market and development strategies.

Students and Participants: For learners, especially adults improving literacy and language skills, the continuation of familiar assessment tools may support a steady educational journey without facing undue disruptions.

In summary, while the notice provides a temporary extension for a key educational tool, it leaves several points unaddressed, such as the motivations for the extension, potential financial implications, and clear guidance over revocation and approval procedures. Addressing these could enhance trust and clarity among all parties involved.

Issues

  • • The document provides information on the continuation of a test approved for use in the NRS, but lacks a detailed explanation of why a sunset period is necessary, potentially leaving stakeholders without full understanding of the rationale.

  • • There is no discussion on the potential costs or financial impacts related to the continuation or revocation of tests, leaving an information gap regarding possible wasteful spending.

  • • The document lacks specific details about the criteria or process by which tests are evaluated for suitability or revocation, which might help stakeholders understand and trust the approval process.

  • • The information regarding obtaining documents in an accessible format is scattered and not fully centralized, which could cause confusion for individuals seeking accessible versions.

  • • The language around revocation of tests is somewhat vague, particularly the circumstances under which a test might be revoked, which could lead to uncertainty among test providers and users.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 969
Sentences: 34
Entities: 103

Language

Nouns: 315
Verbs: 66
Adjectives: 39
Adverbs: 12
Numbers: 72

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.88
Average Sentence Length:
28.50
Token Entropy:
5.18
Readability (ARI):
19.29

Reading Time

about 3 minutes