FR 2024-29296

Overview

Title

Gateway National Recreation Area Fort Hancock 21st Century Advisory Committee

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Secretary of the Interior has decided to keep a special team of helpers to figure out what to do with an old and important place called Fort Hancock so that people can enjoy it in the future.

Summary AI

The Secretary of the Interior has announced the renewal of the Gateway National Recreation Area Fort Hancock 21st Century Advisory Committee. This committee advises on the development of a reuse plan and future uses of the Fort Hancock Historic Landmark District within the Gateway National Recreation Area. The notice complies with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and affirms that the committee's work is in the public interest. Secretary Deb Haaland is responsible for this decision.

Abstract

The Secretary of the Interior is giving notice of renewal of the Gateway National Recreation Area Fort Hancock 21st Century Advisory Committee. The Committee provides advice on the development of a reuse plan and on matters relating to future uses of the Fort Hancock Historic Landmark District of Gateway National Recreation Area.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 100527
Document #: 2024-29296
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 100527-100528

AnalysisAI

This document announces the renewal of the Gateway National Recreation Area Fort Hancock 21st Century Advisory Committee. The committee plays a crucial role in providing guidance on creating a reuse plan and advising on potential future uses for the Fort Hancock Historic Landmark District, which is part of the Gateway National Recreation Area. This announcement was made by the Secretary of the Interior, Deb Haaland, and complies with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

General Summary

The Gateway National Recreation Area Fort Hancock 21st Century Advisory Committee's purpose is to offer advice to the Department of the Interior on matters concerning the repurposing and utilization of the Fort Hancock Historic Landmark District. The notice signifies the continued commitment of the National Park Service to facilitate public and expert opinion in managing national historical sites. This formal extension of the committee ensures ongoing dialogue and consideration of diverse perspectives for the strategic development of Fort Hancock.

Significant Issues or Concerns

The renewal of this advisory committee has not been associated with any reported issues or controversies. It appears to be a standard procedural action that aligns with the National Park Service's goals for public involvement and transparency in decision-making processes. However, it is crucial for the committee to maintain a diverse membership and include voices from various stakeholder groups to ensure balanced advice and recommendations.

Impacts on the Public

For the general public, this renewal suggests that there will continue to be a dedicated focus on engaging community input and expert advice in the planning and development of national historical sites. It reaffirms the government's commitment to preserving cultural and historical landmarks for public enjoyment and education. By facilitating informed decision-making, the committee helps ensure that developments at Fort Hancock align with public interest and historical preservation standards.

Impacts on Specific Stakeholders

Specific stakeholders such as local residents, historical preservationists, and environmental organizations are likely to be positively affected by this renewed committee. Local communities may benefit from enhanced recreational and educational opportunities as the site's potential is thoughtfully and inclusively developed. Preservationists can find reassurance in the fact that the site’s historical significance remains a priority, while environmental groups can advocate for sustainable development practices within the district.

Overall, the renewal of the advisory committee represents a positive step towards inclusive and well-informed management of the Fort Hancock Historic Landmark District. It offers a platform for stakeholders to influence decisions that affect the cultural and historical integrity of the site while addressing the needs and interests of the broader public.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 277
Sentences: 12
Entities: 36

Language

Nouns: 117
Verbs: 9
Adjectives: 5
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 22

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.86
Average Sentence Length:
23.08
Token Entropy:
4.55
Readability (ARI):
16.25

Reading Time

less than a minute