FR 2024-29294

Overview

Title

Marine and Coastal Area-based Management Advisory Committee; Charter Renewal

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Department of Commerce decided that a special group, the Marine and Coastal Area-based Management Advisory Committee, will keep working for two more years to help protect the ocean and beaches. They will give advice about keeping these areas safe and healthy.

Summary AI

The Department of Commerce has renewed the charter for the Marine and Coastal Area-based Management Advisory Committee (MCAM) for two more years, starting December 6, 2024. MCAM advises on protection and conservation efforts in marine areas, supporting initiatives like America the Beautiful as per Executive Order 14008. The committee acts in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and the renewed charter is available online.

Abstract

Notice is hereby given of the two-year renewed charter for the Marine and Coastal Area-based Management Advisory Committee (MCAM), effective on December 6, 2024.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 100471
Document #: 2024-29294
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 100471-100471

AnalysisAI

The document presents the renewal of the charter for the Marine and Coastal Area-based Management Advisory Committee (MCAM) by the Department of Commerce. This renewal is effective for two more years beginning December 6, 2024. The advisory committee is under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which provides guidance on areas related to marine and coastal conservation efforts. These efforts include initiatives like "America the Beautiful," aiming to tackle climate change through area-based protection strategies.

General Summary

The central purpose of the document is to announce the continuation of the MCAM's role in advising on marine and coastal protection and conservation strategies. The guidance provided by the committee aligns with various government initiatives involving climate change and environmental sustainability. The MCAM's charter must be renewed biennially according to federal law, and this document serves as an official notice of such renewal.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One notable concern is the lack of detailed information regarding the budget or funding frameworks that accompany this charter renewal. Transparent budgeting is crucial to ensure that funds are spent effectively and are aligned with public interest goals. The absence of specific funding details leaves room for uncertainties regarding resource allocation efficiency.

Another issue is the ambiguity surrounding the selection process for committee members. Without clear criteria or processes, the selection could be perceived as lacking transparency or fairness. Additionally, while the document mentions "science-based approaches," it does not elaborate on what these entail, possibly causing confusion about the methodologies guiding the committee's advice.

The document refers to "Executive Order 14008," a key legislative driver behind the committee’s initiatives. However, there is no explanation provided for those unfamiliar with this order, making it potentially inaccessible to some readers. Lastly, the document lacks details on the specific objectives or measurable outcomes of the committee's activities, raising questions about accountability and the effectiveness of the committee's advisory role.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, this charter renewal may reassure the public of continued efforts to address marine and coastal environmental challenges through informed advisory determinants. The alignment with executive orders on climate change might also reflect a commitment to broader governmental environmental goals, impacting public environmental policy positively.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For stakeholders directly involved in marine and coastal management, such as environmental organizations and regional authorities, the committee's continued operation ensures an ongoing platform for influencing federal coastal and marine policies. However, the lack of transparency in member selection might concern stakeholders about potential biases or representation issues.

For the general public, especially those interested in environmental conservation, the document reflects promising support for sustainable practices. But without detailed funding and implementation strategies, stakeholders might remain skeptical about tangible progress and outputs arising from the committee's work.

In conclusion, while the renewal of MCAM’s charter represents a continued commitment to tackling marine and coastal environmental challenges, there are legitimate concerns and areas needing clarity for enhanced transparency and accountability.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify the budget or funding details associated with the renewal of the charter for the Marine and Coastal Area-based Management Advisory Committee (MCAM), making it difficult to evaluate potential wasteful spending.

  • • There is no explicit mention of how committee members are selected, which could potentially raise concerns about favoritism or lack of transparency in the selection process.

  • • The document does not provide specific examples or further explanation of what 'science-based approaches' entail, which might lead to ambiguity.

  • • The reference to Executive Order 14008 might be unclear to those not familiar with this order, and there is no summary or explanation provided within the document.

  • • Details on the measurable outcomes or specific objectives of MCAM's advice and activities are not provided, which could raise concerns about accountability and effectiveness.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 417
Sentences: 14
Entities: 50

Language

Nouns: 149
Verbs: 22
Adjectives: 14
Adverbs: 6
Numbers: 21

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.12
Average Sentence Length:
29.79
Token Entropy:
4.82
Readability (ARI):
20.80

Reading Time

about a minute or two