Overview
Title
ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization and Establishing Intervention and Protest Deadline
Agencies
ELI5 AI
ANR Pipeline Company wants to make changes to a big machine in Michigan that helps move gas. They are asking if it's okay and people can share their thoughts on this until February 4, 2025.
Summary AI
ANR Pipeline Company has requested approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to officially update the horsepower capacity of its Bridgman Compressor Station in Michigan. The company replaced its old compressor units with new turbine ones, which have a slightly lower ISO horsepower rating but provide similar capacity. FERC is accepting public input on this request, and interested parties can file protests, motions to intervene, or comments until February 4, 2025. Details on how to participate and access the document are available on FERC's website.
Keywords AI
Sources
AnalysisAI
ANR Pipeline Company has submitted a request to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), seeking permission to officially update the horsepower capacity of its Bridgman Compressor Station located in Michigan. This adjustment follows the replacement of old compressor units with newer, more efficient turbine units. Despite having a slightly lower ISO horsepower rating, these new turbines are designed to provide a capacity equivalent to the previous setup.
General Summary
The document is a formal notice from FERC about ANR's proposal to adjust the certificated horsepower at its Michigan compressor station. It outlines the procedural steps ANR has taken and the regulatory framework under which its request is filed. The main action requested is a modification to reflect the current turbine units' capabilities accurately based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ratings. Importantly, the notice opens the floor for public involvement, setting a deadline for protests, comments, and motions to intervene by February 4, 2025.
Significant Issues and Concerns
Several issues within the document could hinder effective public engagement:
Complexity and Legal Jargon: The document is filled with regulatory terminology and references to specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). This could be confusing to someone without a legal background, reducing the likelihood of informed public participation.
Lack of Clear Justification: The notice does not provide clear reasoning for the necessity of the horsepower restatement. A layperson might find it challenging to understand why these changes are needed and their potential impact.
Dispersed Contact Information: Relevant contact details and instructions are scattered throughout the document. This could create barriers for those wishing to engage or seek further clarification.
Limited Accessibility: The assumption that stakeholders are already familiar with the procedures and deadlines might disadvantage those new to such proceedings, especially if they learn about them late.
Broad Public Impact
The document is an essential engagement tool, allowing the public to voice their opinions or concerns about infrastructural changes in their community. However, the dense and technical nature of the document may intimidate or alienate average community members who might otherwise participate actively.
Impact on Specific Stakeholders
Local Communities: Residents living near the Bridgman Compressor Station might have immediate concerns about how modifications could affect local air quality, noise, or safety. Without clear explanations, these stakeholders may not fully understand the implications of the changes.
Environmental Groups: These organizations are likely to scrutinize the environmental impact of updating compressor stations. The document's lack of explicit environmental considerations could be viewed critically.
Technical Experts and Legal Professionals: These stakeholders may find the document straightforward due to their familiarity with the processes and jargon, positioning them as better prepared to influence the proceeding effectively.
In conclusion, while the document reflects a standard procedural announcement from FERC, its accessibility could be greatly enhanced by simplifying the language, consolidating key information, and elucidating the reasons behind the request. These steps would facilitate more meaningful public participation, empowering individuals and communities affected by such projects to engage with and influence outcomes more effectively.
Issues
• The document contains complex regulatory and procedural language that may be difficult for the general public to understand, potentially restricting meaningful public participation.
• The notice references specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) without providing clear explanations or summaries of what those sections entail, which could hinder comprehension for those not familiar with the regulations.
• The deadline for filing protests, motions to intervene, and comments is set at a specific future date, which presumes that all interested parties are aware of this timeline well in advance, potentially disadvantaging those who hear about it later.
• The document does not provide a direct explanation or reasoning behind why the certificated horsepower at the Bridgman Compressor Station requires modification or restating, which might raise questions about the necessity or impact of the changes.
• The contact and procedural information are distributed throughout the text and could be consolidated for clarity and ease of access to ensure interested parties know exactly how to engage with the process.
• The document assumes a high level of familiarity with FERC processes and jargon, which might exclude or discourage participation from less experienced stakeholders such as average ratepayers or local community members.