FR 2024-29271

Overview

Title

Technical Advisory Committee; Request for Nominations

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Bureau of Labor Statistics wants people to join a special team and help with their work on numbers and surveys. They need new team members by April 2025, and people can suggest someone for the team until January 2025.

Summary AI

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is seeking nominations for new members to join its Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Six member positions will become vacant by April 2025, and other potential vacancies could arise by that date. The TAC provides expertise in areas such as economics, statistics, data science, and survey design, helping BLS with technical data issues. Interested individuals or organizations can nominate candidates by January 13, 2025, and nominees must not be registered lobbyists.

Abstract

The BLS is soliciting new members for the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to address six member terms expiring on April 13, 2025, and any additional vacancies that may occur on the TAC between the date of publication of this notice and April 13, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 100542
Document #: 2024-29271
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 100542-100543

AnalysisAI

Summary of the Document

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has announced a call for nominations for new members to join its Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). This advisory committee plays a crucial role in providing expertise on a range of subjects, including economics, statistics, data science, and survey design. The committee helps the BLS in addressing technical data issues, proposing improvements, and formulating economic measures. Six committee seats will open up by April 2025, with the possibility of additional vacancies. Interested individuals and organizations have until January 13, 2025, to submit nominations.

Significant Issues and Concerns

Several concerns arise from the details shared in the document:

  • Email-Only Nominations: The document directs that nominations are submitted exclusively via email, attributed to the telework situation during the BLS's relocation. This requirement could disadvantage individuals lacking reliable internet access, potentially narrowing the pool of candidates.

  • Ambiguity in Expectations: The role of TAC members as "Special Government Employees" and their responsibilities, particularly as unpaid members, are not elaborated upon. This lack of clarity might create confusion regarding expectations, commitments, and responsibilities associated with the role.

  • Time Commitment Estimate: While the document mentions a minimum commitment of two days per year for meetings, it does not account for any additional time required for preparation or other committee tasks. This incomplete depiction may deter potential nominees who prioritize transparency regarding time commitments.

  • Inclusivity Measures: Although there is a call for diversity in nominations, the document overlooks specific strategies or criteria to ensure inclusivity in the appointment process. It may undermine efforts to effectively diversify the committee.

  • Complex Language: Particularly in the more technical sections, the document uses complex language that might be challenging for individuals without backgrounds in economics or data science to fully comprehend.

General and Stakeholder Impact

The BLS's initiative presents both general and specific impacts:

  • General Public Impact: Broadly, the work of the TAC holds significance as it directly contributes to the accuracy and relevance of labor statistics, which are foundational to economic policy and decision-making. The public benefits from enhanced data quality and trust in statistical outputs.

  • Stakeholder Impact: For those in the academic, data science, and economic professions, the opportunity to serve on the TAC opens the possibility to contribute meaningfully to national statistical measures. However, the email-only nomination process and undefined role expectations might disincentivize qualified candidates from less-connected backgrounds or those expecting clarity on obligations.

Overall, the BLS's call for nominations strives to enhance the advisory committee's expertise mix. However, it also necessitates addressing certain shortcomings in communication and inclusivity to ensure broad and effective participation from diverse pools of candidates.

Issues

  • • The document states that nominations are being accepted only through email due to maximum telework status pending relocation, which could be limiting for individuals without reliable internet access.

  • • The document mentions a commitment of at least two days per year for meetings but does not specify the potential time and effort required for preparation or additional tasks associated with committee responsibilities.

  • • The document encourages diversity but does not outline specific measures to ensure inclusivity in the nomination and selection process.

  • • The definition of 'Special Government Employees' and their responsibilities as unpaid members is not elaborated, which might create ambiguity regarding the expectations and obligations of the position.

  • • The document’s language, particularly in the 'SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION' section, is somewhat complex and may not be easily comprehensible to individuals without a background in economics or data science.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,129
Sentences: 49
Entities: 77

Language

Nouns: 399
Verbs: 104
Adjectives: 70
Adverbs: 27
Numbers: 25

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.09
Average Sentence Length:
23.04
Token Entropy:
5.32
Readability (ARI):
17.90

Reading Time

about 4 minutes