FR 2024-29262

Overview

Title

Notice of Intended Repatriation: The Kikuchi Center at Kaua'i Community College, Līhu'e, HI

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Kikuchi Center at Kaua'i Community College is planning to give back some special items to Native Hawaiian groups because they belonged to their ancestors, like a toothbrush made from bone and tools used long ago. They will work with these groups to make sure the right people get them back.

Summary AI

The Kikuchi Center at Kaua'i Community College plans to return certain cultural items that meet the criteria for unassociated funerary objects under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). These items, including a 19th-century non-human bone toothbrush, a kapa beater, and three coral abraders, are believed to be linked to Native Hawaiian burial practices. The repatriation process may start on or after January 13, 2025, and will involve consulting with Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations that have shown a cultural connection to these items. If there are multiple requests for the same items, the Kikuchi Center will determine the most appropriate requestor.

Abstract

In accordance with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), the Kikuchi Center at Kaua[revaps]i Community College intends to repatriate certain cultural items that meet the definition of unassociated funerary objects and that have a cultural affiliation with the Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations in this notice.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 100532
Document #: 2024-29262
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 100532-100533

AnalysisAI

This document from the Federal Register outlines the intentions of the Kikuchi Center at Kaua'i Community College to repatriate cultural items under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). These items, identified as unassociated funerary objects, include a 19th-century non-human bone toothbrush, a kapa beater, and three coral abraders. They are considered to be linked with Native Hawaiian burial traditions. The repatriation process can commence on January 13, 2025, in collaboration with Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations that demonstrate cultural affiliation with these items.

General Summary

The document is a formal notice under the auspices of the National Park Service, detailing the intention to return cultural artifacts that have been stored at the Kikuchi Center. It describes both the specific items involved and the process by which they were determined to be significant to Native Hawaiian cultural practices. The notice also sets the date from which repatriation can begin and elaborates on how interested parties can lay claim to these items.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One of the major issues within this document is the lack of specific details regarding how competing requests from different organizations or individuals will be addressed. While it acknowledges the possibility of multiple requests for the same items, the document does not clarify the criteria or process for resolving such disputes. Additionally, the document uses technical terms such as "preponderance of the evidence" and "provenance research," which may be confusing to a general audience. Lastly, the notice doesn't provide clarity on financial aspects of this repatriation—whether there is a dedicated budget or funding source remains unspecified.

Public Impact

Broadly, this initiative demonstrates a commitment to cultural sensitivity and rectifying past oversights regarding indigenous artifacts. For the general public, this action underscores the importance of cultural preservation and respect for native communities. Moreover, it highlights the ongoing efforts to legally and ethically manage historical items.

Stakeholder Impact

For Native Hawaiian organizations and tribes, this notice signifies an opportunity to reclaim items of cultural importance, fostering cultural heritage and continuity. It can be a positive step towards healing and recognition of historical injustices. For institutions like Kikuchi Center, this process presents a practice in cultural responsibility, ensuring that such items are returned to rightful parties. Conversely, without clear guidelines on resolving competing claims, there is a potential for disputes or dissatisfaction among organizations that believe they have valid claims to these objects.

This notice, while primarily administrative, carries emotional and cultural weight for the involved communities. Ensuring clarity, fairness, and accessibility throughout the process is crucial for the success and integrity of this repatriation effort.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide any specific cost or spending details related to the repatriation process, making it difficult to assess potential wasteful spending or favoritism.

  • • The language in some parts of the document could be complex for a general audience, such as 'provenance research' or 'preponderance of the evidence'.

  • • The abstract is somewhat repetitive of the summary, which may lead to redundant reading.

  • • The document does not specify how 'competing requests' for repatriation will be resolved, which could lead to ambiguity in the process.

  • • There is no information on the funding source or budget allocation for the repatriation activities, which makes it unclear if there is any potential financial impact.

  • • The definition and distinction between 'unassociated funerary objects' and 'associated funerary objects' are not explained in the document, which might be unclear to some readers unfamiliar with NAGPRA terminology.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,142
Sentences: 44
Entities: 112

Language

Nouns: 379
Verbs: 66
Adjectives: 90
Adverbs: 7
Numbers: 86

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.79
Average Sentence Length:
25.95
Token Entropy:
5.17
Readability (ARI):
17.67

Reading Time

about 4 minutes