FR 2024-29142

Overview

Title

Notice of Segregation of Public Lands for the Pinyon Solar Project, Maricopa County, Arizona and Elisabeth Solar Project, Yuma County, Arizona County, Utah

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The government is setting aside a big piece of land in Arizona for two solar projects, so people can't mine there for a while, making it easier to plan and see if these projects can use the land.

Summary AI

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is setting aside 4,439.92 acres of public land in Arizona for two solar projects, the Pinyon Solar Project and the Elisabeth Solar Project, for up to two years. This temporary segregation prevents the land from being claimed for activities like mining, allowing time to decide on leasing the land to the solar projects while preserving existing rights. The Pinyon project covers 1,879.92 acres and is being evaluated through an Environmental Assessment (EA), while Elisabeth aims to develop 2,560 acres already under a lease and is nearing the completion of its EA. The segregation will end once a decision is made on the right-of-way application, or through other specified conditions.

Abstract

In connection with its consideration of the right-of-way (ROW) application (AZA38172) for the Pinyon Solar Project, and the proposed plan of development for the Elisabeth Solar Project, for which the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) previously issued a right-of-way lease (AZA38371), the BLM is segregating 4,439.92 acres of public lands from appropriation under the public land laws, including location under the Mining Law of 1872, but not the Mineral Leasing Act or Material Sales Act, for a period of 2 years from the date of publication of this notice, subject to valid existing rights. This segregation is to allow for the orderly administration of the public lands and to facilitate consideration of development of renewable energy resources.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 100520
Document #: 2024-29142
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 100520-100521

AnalysisAI

Overview of the Document

This document lays out a notice from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regarding the segregation of 4,439.92 acres of public lands in Arizona, divided between the Pinyon Solar Project and the Elisabeth Solar Project. For two years from the notice's publication, this land will not be available for activities like mining. The aim is to manage the land effectively while considering development for renewable energy purposes. The Pinyon project involves a potential 300-megawatt solar facility, while the Elisabeth project is already under lease for solar development. The document details the projects' environmental assessments and provides contact information for further inquiries.

Key Issues and Concerns

One concern is the potential impact this segregation could have on existing mining or other land-use interests given the land's temporary withdrawal from potential mining claims. Although the notice adheres to regulations, such as the Mining Law of 1872, there is a lack of clear guidance or recourse for those stakeholders whose interests might be adversely affected. The use of complex legal jargon and precise land descriptions might also be daunting for individuals not well-versed in legal or land surveying terminology, obscuring crucial information about the land and its intended future use.

Furthermore, the document references specific companies like 265BH 8me, LLC for the Pinyon Project and Elisabeth Solar, LLC for the Elisabeth Project. However, it does not elaborate on the selection or approval process for these companies, which might raise questions about transparency and fairness in the handling of such leases.

Impact on the Public

For the general public, this segregation represents an effort to transition lands for renewable energy production, aligning with wider environmental goals. However, the temporary withdrawal from other uses might sideline interests such as mining, recreational use, or other economic activities reliant on such areas. The document's lack of clarity in plain language poses a risk of unawareness among the public regarding the significance and future implications of these projects.

Impact on Stakeholders

Positively, stakeholders in renewable energy, like Avantus LLC and Leeward Renewable Energy LLC, may benefit from this segregation, as it allows them to proceed with project development without the complication of competing claims over the land. Conversely, stakeholders in mining and other land-use sectors might be negatively impacted, as their potential to use these lands is temporarily suspended. The absence of detailed guidance for these parties on how to address their queries or concerns about the segregation might lead to dissatisfaction or adverse economic implications.

In conclusion, while the document's initiative supports renewable energy development, it also raises issues concerning transparency, stakeholder impact, and public understanding. Addressing these concerns with clearer communication and inclusive consideration could enhance compliance and cooperation from all involved parties.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide a clear explanation of the potential impact on existing mining operations or interests due to the segregation of lands under the Mining Law of 1872.

  • • The language regarding segregation of public lands could be simplified to improve understanding for a wider audience, particularly the legal references and land descriptions which are complex.

  • • The document references specific regulations, but it does not clarify how these regulations affect stakeholders or provide guidance on how affected parties can seek recourse or additional information.

  • • There is no clear indication of potential consequences for not complying with the terms set forth in the segregation notice.

  • • The description of the land areas involved in the Pinyon and Elisabeth Solar Projects is very technical and may not be immediately understandable to those without expertise in land surveying or legal land descriptions.

  • • There might be a perception of preferential treatment as the document mentions specific companies, such as 265BH 8me, LLC, and Elisabeth Solar, LLC, without detailing the selection or approval process for their projects.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 1,501
Sentences: 32
Entities: 142

Language

Nouns: 457
Verbs: 89
Adjectives: 55
Adverbs: 10
Numbers: 141

Complexity

Average Token Length:
6.21
Average Sentence Length:
46.91
Token Entropy:
4.94
Readability (ARI):
34.61

Reading Time

about 8 minutes