FR 2024-29141

Overview

Title

Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery; Quota Transfer From New Jersey to North Carolina

Agencies

ELI5 AI

New Jersey gave some of its fishing limit for a type of fish called bluefish to North Carolina so that North Carolina wouldn't catch too many. Now, New Jersey can catch less fish, and North Carolina can catch more fish until the end of the month.

Summary AI

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announced a temporary rule allowing New Jersey to transfer part of its 2024 commercial bluefish quota to North Carolina. This action follows the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan's rules, ensuring North Carolina doesn't exceed its quota. New Jersey will transfer 40,000 pounds to North Carolina, resulting in a new quota of 108,898 pounds for New Jersey and 1,170,996 pounds for North Carolina. The rule is effective from December 11, 2024, to December 31, 2024.

Abstract

NMFS announces that the State of New Jersey is transferring a portion of their 2024 commercial bluefish quota to the State of North Carolina. This quota adjustment is necessary to comply with the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan (FMP) quota transfer provisions. This announcement informs the public of the revised 2024 commercial bluefish quotas for New Jersey and North Carolina.

Type: Rule
Citation: 89 FR 100402
Document #: 2024-29141
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 100402-100403

AnalysisAI

The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), operating under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has announced a temporary rule regarding the transfer of bluefish quotas for 2024. Specifically, the State of New Jersey will transfer 40,000 pounds of its commercial bluefish quota to North Carolina. This adjustment is necessary to align with the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan (FMP), which allows for such transfers between states to prevent quota exceedance and ensure sustainable fishery practices.

General Summary of the Document

The document outlines an important administrative decision involving the states of New Jersey and North Carolina. Because New Jersey is transferring part of its quota to North Carolina, the new quota totals for 2024 are 108,898 pounds for New Jersey and 1,170,996 pounds for North Carolina. The rule is effective from December 11, 2024, to the end of that year. This decision was made following criteria set forth in the FMP and is intended to address specific contingencies in the fishery, ensuring that the overall annual quota is not exceeded and remaining consistent with regulatory objectives.

Significant Issues or Concerns

One notable issue is the lack of detailed explanation for New Jersey’s decision to transfer part of its quota aside from ensuring North Carolina does not exceed its own quota. More context on this decision would provide clarity for stakeholders who may be affected by such changes. Additionally, the document does not delve into any potential financial or economic consequences this transfer could entail for either state, which might be critical for businesses and individuals involved in the fishery sectors. The legal jargon and references to specific federal regulations may also pose comprehension challenges for those without legal expertise, potentially obscuring the rationale and implications of this temporary rule.

Impact on the Public Broadly

For the general public, this quota adjustment may go largely unnoticed unless individuals are directly involved in the fishing industry or reside in affected coastal areas. However, ensuring that state quotas align with national and environmental guidelines serves broader public interests by supporting sustainable fishing practices, which preserve bluefish populations for future generations and maintain ecosystem balance.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

Commercial fisheries in New Jersey and North Carolina are the primary stakeholders affected by this temporary rule. New Jersey fisheries must adapt to a reduced quota, which could impact their catch and revenue. Conversely, North Carolina may benefit from the increased quota, potentially boosting their fishing activities and economic returns. The stakeholders will need to continually monitor compliance and prepare for any changes in quotas, which can affect operational planning, workforce decisions, and long-term sustainability practices.

In conclusion, while quota transfers are crucial for managing fish stocks effectively and avoiding overfishing, better transparency and detailed information could aid stakeholders in understanding and adapting to these regulatory changes.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide detailed information on the reasons behind New Jersey's decision to transfer part of its quota to North Carolina, aside from preventing an exceedance of North Carolina's quota.

  • • There is no information on the financial or economic implications of this quota transfer for either New Jersey or North Carolina, which may be important for stakeholders.

  • • The legal terms and references, such as those to the Magnuson-Stevens Act and specific CFR sections, may be difficult for individuals without a legal background to understand, potentially impeding public comprehension of the rule's rationale and implications.

  • • The document does not elaborate on any monitoring or enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with the transferred quotas, which could be a concern for resource management and conservation effectiveness.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 590
Sentences: 24
Entities: 76

Language

Nouns: 199
Verbs: 37
Adjectives: 28
Adverbs: 1
Numbers: 53

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.60
Average Sentence Length:
24.58
Token Entropy:
5.00
Readability (ARI):
15.91

Reading Time

about 2 minutes