FR 2024-29093

The document in question is a notice from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), announcing the acceptance of an application filed by Oswego Hydro Partners, LP, for a new major license regarding the Phoenix Hydroelectric Project in New York. This notice outlines key details about the project, the application process, and invites public participation through protests or motions to intervene by February 3, 2025.

General Overview

The Phoenix Hydroelectric Project is proposed to continue its operation on the Oswego, Oneida, and Seneca Rivers, utilizing existing infrastructure such as the Phoenix Dam. The project has a combined generating capacity of 3.18 megawatts and involves sophisticated engineering elements, including Kaplan turbine-generator units, Tainter gates, and various spillways. The application details the operational modes and environmental considerations that the project will maintain or adjust. Interested parties can inspect the application online or at the Phoenix Public Library.

Significant Issues and Concerns

One noticeable concern is the document's lack of transparency regarding the financial aspect of the proposed plans. It does not discuss the costs associated with obtaining the new license or the potential expenses involved in implementing environmental safeguards and other operational plans. This omission can be a significant concern for stakeholders who require financial clarity.

Additionally, the technical jargon used in describing the hydroelectric project might be challenging for non-specialist stakeholders. Terms such as "ogee spillway" and "Tainter gates" might be unfamiliar to the general public, potentially hindering their understanding and ability to engage meaningfully in the public comment process.

The document also states a proposal to discontinue certain water quality monitoring measures when inflow conditions fall below a specific threshold. This decision is not accompanied by any analysis of environmental impacts, potentially raising concerns among environmental advocacy groups about the broader ecological implications.

Moreover, there are brief mentions of plans for the protection of wildlife, such as the Bat and Bald Eagle Protection Plan and a fish passage maintenance plan. However, the document lacks detailed information on these initiatives, making it difficult for stakeholders to evaluate their adequacy or effectiveness.

Broader Public Impact

The announcement invites public engagement, which empowers individuals and communities to express their concerns or support regarding the hydroelectric project. This participatory process ensures that a range of perspectives can be considered, potentially leading to more balanced and informed decision-making.

However, the absence of financial data may deter some stakeholders from engaging, particularly those concerned with economic impacts. Additionally, the complexity of the technical language could discourage or complicate participation from individuals lacking specific technical knowledge.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

The proposal to continue operating in a run-of-river mode will likely resonate positively with certain environmental groups, as this approach generally minimizes ecological disruption. However, the proposed cessation of water quality monitoring could negatively impact downstream ecosystems and local communities reliant on these water resources, raising flags for environmental advocates.

Conversely, Oswego Hydro Partners, LP stands to benefit economically from securing a new major license, which ensures the continued operation of their hydroelectric assets. However, without detailed cost analysis and transparency, questions may arise regarding who else, if anyone, will economically benefit from the project’s continuation.

The lack of detailed plans about wildlife protection measures could be a source of contention among conservationists seeking assurances that local habitats and species will not be adversely affected by ongoing operations.

In conclusion, while the federal notice provides a platform for public participation and outlines the project's fundamental aspects, it leaves several unanswered questions, particularly regarding financial transparency, technical clarity, and detailed environmental protections, which could significantly influence public and stakeholder reaction.