FR 2024-29024

Overview

Title

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Form 1-K

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) wants permission to keep asking certain companies, called issuers, to fill out a special form every year, which is very important but takes a lot of time—about 600 hours. People can tell the SEC what they think about this from December 12, 2024, to January 13, 2025.

Summary AI

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is requesting an extension for collecting certain information using Form 1-K, as required under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Form 1-K is mandatory for Tier 2 issuers who conduct offerings under Regulation A and need to file annual reports. There are about 353 issuers that file this form each year, and preparing it requires around 600 hours. The public can submit comments on this information request from December 12, 2024, to January 13, 2025.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 99923
Document #: 2024-29024
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 99923-99923

AnalysisAI

Overview

The document under review is a notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding the extension request for the use of Form 1-K. This form is crucial for Tier 2 issuers under Regulation A, enabling them to file annual reports as required under the Securities Act of 1933. The notice is submitted pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which aims to minimize the paperwork burden for individuals and businesses. About 353 issuers are expected to file Form 1-K annually, and it requires substantial effort—approximately 600 hours of preparation per form.

Key Points and Concerns

The notice estimates that 75% of the 600 hours needed for form preparation—amounting to 450 hours—will be done internally by each company. This estimation points toward a total annual burden of 158,850 hours across all issuers. The public is invited to comment on this information collection request from December 12, 2024, to January 13, 2025, offering stakeholders an opportunity to voice concerns or suggestions.

While the document lays out the procedural aspects, it does not provide an analysis or justification for why the preparation is so time-intensive. This lack of explanation can be concerning considering the potential burden these requirements place on issuers, particularly those smaller in size that may have limited resources. Similarly, the document does not explore the costs entailed in such preparation or whether such burdens might appear excessive or wasteful.

Furthermore, there is no mention of supports or mechanisms available to assist these companies in preparing the form, which could alleviate the burden. The reliance on internal preparation, accounting for the majority of the time, raises questions about whether external help could be more efficient or cost-effective.

Broader Implications

From a broader perspective, this paperwork requirement may affect the public by influencing the transparency and financial health of companies engaging in Tier 2 offerings. By requiring detailed annual reports, the SEC aims to provide investors and the general public with reliable information, promoting informed investment decisions.

The significant requirement of preparing Form 1-K could also deter small companies from engaging in offerings under Regulation A, potentially limiting investment opportunities for smaller but promising businesses. The public, therefore, might miss out on diverse investment options as smaller companies face hurdles.

Impact on Stakeholders

For larger entities, these additional reporting requirements could be absorbed into their existing compliance frameworks more easily, thereby not posing as significant a burden. Smaller stakeholders, such as emerging companies, might find the time and resource demands especially challenging. This might place them at a competitive disadvantage or discourage them from seeking to raise capital through Regulation A offerings altogether.

In conclusion, while the notice serves its statutory purpose, its practical implications need closer scrutiny, particularly about the equity of its impact among differently-resourced issuers, to ensure that it aligns with the broader regulatory goals without unduly burdening smaller market participants.

Financial Assessment

The document reviewed highlights the financial requirements and obligations for Tier 2 issuers under Regulation A. It focuses on the usage and preparation burden associated with filing Form 1-K. This form plays a critical role in ensuring that the public is informed about companies conducting offerings under this specific exemption.

Financial References and Requirements

Tier 2 issuers undertaking offerings of up to $50 million within a 12-month period are mandated to file Form 1-K. This filing includes audited year-end financial statements that provide detailed information about the issuer's business operations, ownership, management, liquidity, capital resources, and annual operations. Such rigorous disclosure is meant to maintain transparency and provide stakeholders with critical financial insights into the company's standing.

Relation to Identified Issues

One of the main issues identified in this notice is the substantial burden of preparing Form 1-K, estimated at 600 hours per response. This extensive time commitment represents a significant allocation of resources, largely borne by the companies themselves. The document notes that 75% of these hours, which equates to 450 hours, are prepared internally by the company. This raises concerns about the efficiency of resource use and whether smaller issuers might find this burden excessively onerous. There is no clear explanation provided on why this time commitment is necessary or justified, which leaves questions about potential wasteful expenditure of resources.

The issue of support mechanisms is also pertinent. The document does not delineate any methods for assisting issuers with these financial documentation requirements. Offering guidance or resources could alleviate some of the financial strain posed by these extensive preparation hours and possibly reduce the associated costs of compliance.

Finally, the document touches upon the lack of discussion regarding whether external support could be more efficient than the predominantly internal preparation approach. Given the high number of hours and potential costs involved, exploring alternative solutions or improvements in these procedures could benefit issuers, particularly smaller entities that may face the greatest impact due to resource limitations. The document does not suggest that any current practices might be optimized for cost or time efficiency without sacrificing thoroughness or compliance with regulatory standards.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide a clear explanation or context for why the time required to prepare Form 1-K is estimated to be 600 hours, which could be a significant burden for some issuers.

  • • There is no discussion on whether the estimated annual burden of 158,850 hours or the potential costs and resources required by issuers to compile this information could be considered wasteful, especially for smaller companies.

  • • The document lacks clarity on what mechanisms or support may be available to assist issuers in preparing Form 1-K, which may help mitigate the extensive time burden reported.

  • • The document does not explain why the estimated 75% of preparation time is internal, which might raise concerns about favoritism or inefficiencies if external consultation or aid could streamline processes.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 1
Words: 452
Sentences: 14
Entities: 47

Language

Nouns: 154
Verbs: 34
Adjectives: 12
Adverbs: 8
Numbers: 46

Complexity

Average Token Length:
4.71
Average Sentence Length:
32.29
Token Entropy:
4.99
Readability (ARI):
20.46

Reading Time

about a minute or two