FR 2024-29021

Overview

Title

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Coastal Ocean Program Grants Proposal Application Package

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The people in charge of America's oceans want to gather ideas from people on how to keep the ocean healthy, and they want everyone to help make it easier to share these ideas. But they did not say show how they would pick the best ideas or if the way they choose is fair.

Summary AI

The Department of Commerce has announced it will submit an information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This request involves gathering information for the Coastal Ocean Program Grants Proposal Application, which includes forms and reports related to managing coastal ecosystems. The public is invited to comment on this information collection to help reduce unnecessary burdens. Comments must be submitted within 30 days of the notice date, and details can be found on the website reginfo.gov.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 99840
Document #: 2024-29021
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 99840-99841

AnalysisAI

The document published in the Federal Register is a notice from the Department of Commerce regarding its intention to submit an information collection request related to the Coastal Ocean Program Grants Proposal Application. This submission requires approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and aims to gather various forms and reports necessary for managing coastal ecosystems. The public is encouraged to provide comments about the information collection to minimize unnecessary burdens. Comments should be submitted within a 30-day window following the notice's publication. Further details and submission instructions are available at reginfo.gov.


General Summary

The notice outlines the Department of Commerce's proposal to revise and extend an existing information collection approved for the Coastal Ocean Program, now part of the Competitive Research Program (CRP). This initiative, operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), involves grants and cooperative agreements aimed at supporting coastal ecosystem management. The document highlights new and ongoing information requirements such as project summaries, data management templates, milestone Gantt charts, and various progress reports.

Significant Issues

One notable concern is the lack of explicit criteria for awarding the grants. This could lead to perceptions of favoritism or a lack of transparency in how funds are allocated. In addition, the list of necessary forms and requirements could be daunting for new or smaller applicants, particularly those lacking dedicated resources for grant management. These complexities might dissuade potential participants from engaging with the program.

The missing abstract also stands out, as it usually offers a succinct overview of the request's intent and scope, aiding in the reader's comprehension of the document.

Furthermore, the document lacks any mention of metrics or methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the grants. Without such measures, it is challenging to ascertain whether the funds are being utilized as intended or achieving the desired outcomes. Additionally, the descriptions of the required reports and forms could be more concise to improve readability and accessibility.

Impact on the Public

Broadly, the document provides an opportunity for public engagement in government processes related to environmental management. By inviting comments, the Department of Commerce appears to prioritize transparency and public participation. However, the complexity and volume of the information required may deter individuals and smaller organizations from submitting comments or participating in the grant application process.

Impact on Specific Stakeholders

For organizations deeply involved in coastal management, such as non-profit institutions, businesses, and local governments, this document signals a continuation of financial support avenues. Participants in these programs might benefit from the specialized formats and structured requirements, potentially easing the completion of necessary paperwork.

Conversely, smaller or less-resourced entities may find the application process burdensome. The complexity of required documentation, along with the need to understand grant-specific formats, could result in unequal access to grant opportunities. Thus, while the document holds positive potential for enhancing coastal ecosystem management, it may inadvertently disadvantage smaller stakeholders unless additional support is provided for navigating the requirements.


This notice reflects a critical step in ongoing environmental management efforts but raises several issues that could impact the equitable distribution and effective use of grant resources. The public's input, particularly from diverse stakeholders, will be essential in refining the information collection processes to ensure inclusivity and transparency.

Issues

  • • The document does not provide specific details on the criteria for awarding the grants, which could lead to concerns regarding favoritism or lack of transparency.

  • • The mention of various forms and requirements (e.g., project summary, Gantt chart, Data Management form) may be overly complex for new applicants, particularly smaller organizations without dedicated grant management resources.

  • • The abstract is missing, which could be beneficial for summarizing the intent and scope of the information collection request.

  • • There is no mention of metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of these grants, making it hard to determine if funds are being utilized efficiently or accomplishing intended goals.

  • • The description of required reports and forms could be more concise to enhance readability and understanding.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 886
Sentences: 39
Entities: 83

Language

Nouns: 346
Verbs: 53
Adjectives: 42
Adverbs: 11
Numbers: 38

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.40
Average Sentence Length:
22.72
Token Entropy:
5.19
Readability (ARI):
19.03

Reading Time

about 3 minutes