FR 2024-28965

Overview

Title

Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative; Notice Inviting Post-Meeting Comments

Agencies

ELI5 AI

The Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative had a meeting to talk about important topics, and now they're asking people to share their thoughts about what was discussed. You have until early January to send in your thoughts, either online or by mail, to help them understand what everyone thinks.

Summary AI

The Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative held a public meeting on November 12, 2024, and is now inviting the public to submit comments on topics discussed during the meeting. Interested individuals have 30 days from the notice's publication date to submit their comments. Comments can be submitted online via the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's website, or by mail to their offices in Washington, DC, or Rockville, Maryland. For more details or assistance, individuals can contact FERC Online Support or Cecelia Coffey at the Office of the General Counsel.

Type: Notice
Citation: 89 FR 99243
Document #: 2024-28965
Date:
Volume: 89
Pages: 99243-99244

AnalysisAI

The document from the Federal Register is a notice inviting public comments following a meeting of the Federal and State Current Issues Collaborative. Held on November 12, 2024, this meeting was backed by the Energy Department and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The public is given an opportunity to submit input on the issues discussed during this meeting. The window for submitting comments is limited to 30 days from the publication date of the notice, which is December 10, 2024.

Summary and Key Details

In essence, the notice serves as an open call for public engagement, a common practice in regulatory processes to foster transparency and participatory decision-making. The public can submit their comments electronically or through traditional mail, with specified addresses for each method.

However, the document lacks specific details about the issues raised during the meeting. This absence of information may limit the public's ability to make informed and relevant contributions. Participants might need to rely on external sources or previous knowledge about the topics typically covered by such collaborative efforts.

Potential Concerns

Several concerns arise from this document:

  • Lack of Detailed Guidance: The notice directs individuals to a separate link to learn about electronic filing procedures without detailing these instructions in the document itself. This might inconvenience those less familiar with digital processes and add an extra step to participation.

  • Postal Address Confusion: The notice provides two mailing addresses for paper submissions, one in Washington, DC, and another in Rockville, Maryland. The lack of clear guidance on which address to use depending on the type of mail carrier could lead to misdirected submissions.

  • Unclear Outcomes: The document does not specify any potential outcomes or actions that may result from the submitted comments. This could discourage participation due to a perceived lack of impact or transparency regarding how comments will be used.

Public Impact

For the general public, the opportunity to comment represents a chance to influence energy-related policymaking, potentially impacting areas such as energy rates, environmental policy, and energy infrastructure development. However, the effectiveness of this opportunity is contingent on the public's awareness and understanding of the issues at hand.

Stakeholder Impact

Entities like energy companies, environmental advocacy groups, and state regulatory bodies might have a more significant stake and interest in the outcomes of this notice. These stakeholders are better positioned to provide informed, strategic feedback that could shape regulatory actions. However, the lack of detailed issue coverage in the notice might require these stakeholders to engage in additional information-gathering efforts to craft their responses effectively.

In conclusion, while the notice is a standard procedure to involve public opinion in governmental deliberations, enhancing the clarity and accessibility of information within such documents could lead to more meaningful participation. The effectiveness of public comments could be improved by clarifying submission details and transparently outlining how contributions will influence future decisions.

Issues

  • • The document does not specify what specific issues were raised during the November 12, 2024, meeting, which might limit the effectiveness of post-meeting comments.

  • • Instructions for electronic filing are referenced but are not detailed in the document, requiring individuals to visit a separate link for further information.

  • • There is no discussion or information on potential outcomes or actions stemming from the comments submitted, which might lead to uncertainty about the impact of public participation.

  • • The two separate mailing addresses for paper submissions could potentially cause confusion, especially without a clear indication of which address is appropriate for different types of carriers.

Statistics

Size

Pages: 2
Words: 303
Sentences: 15
Entities: 40

Language

Nouns: 93
Verbs: 15
Adjectives: 10
Adverbs: 4
Numbers: 31

Complexity

Average Token Length:
5.24
Average Sentence Length:
20.20
Token Entropy:
4.74
Readability (ARI):
16.32

Reading Time

about a minute or two